Accountability
Trudeau’s ‘anti-hate’ bill will allow Canadians to preemptively report hate speech
Hate speech legislation that has been proposed in Canada would allow people to take other individuals to court if they believe that person will post content in the future considered hateful online.
The legislation was reintroduced by Diversity Minister Ahmed Hussen following the events that have taken place in Ottawa in the past few weeks.
Bill C-36 notes that “a person may, with the Attorney General’s consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit (a) an offence under section 318 [advocating genocide] or subsection 319 [inciting or promoting hate, promoting hatred].”It additionally covers “an offence motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or any other similar factor.” The bill’s reintroduction came from Diversity Minister Ahmed after the events that have occurred in Ottawa regarding the Freedom Convoy in which a small number of individuals at the protests carried hateful symbols like the swastika.
Ahmed said the symbols were “reprehensible,” adding that the government would bring back the bill that had died when the election was called last year. “Seeing symbols of hate right across the doorstep of our Parliament is unbelievable and should be condemned,” he said.
The bill offers that “hatred means the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike or disdain.” But academics and human rights advocates noted that the first version of the bill, which had been proposed by Heritage Minister Steven Builbeault, was “aggressive,” “punitive,” and “disturbing.”
“The proposals fail to account for the importance of protecting the kinds of expression that are most central to a free and democratic society including journalism, academic scholarship and public interest research, debate, artistic creation, criticism and political dissent,” said the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab.
-
Civilization3 days agoIran’s Chemical and Biological Options in a U.S. Ground Invasion
-
Education5 days agoCongress Examines Forces Fueling Campus Antisemitism
-
Civilization4 days agoHow Iran Put the World in a Straitjacket
-
Civilization5 days agoVirginia Democrats’ Proposed Gerrymander is a ‘Span-amander’
-
Executive4 days agoWaste of the Day: Lawyers Rake in Fees From Chicago’s Wrongful Convictions
-
Civilization4 days agoWhy Military Bases Should Never Have Been Gun-Free Zones
-
Civilization2 days agoNATO and the Bar Fight: A Bar Tab Europe Expects America To Pay Forever
-
Civilization2 days agoThe Ideological Parallels Between ISIS and the IRGC
