Legislative
New York congressional candidate releases porn video featuring himself to promote ‘sex positive’ stance
Liberal Party candidate Mike Itkis, who is running against Jerry Nadler (D) for New York’s 12th district, has released a pornographic video, featuring himself.
One of Iktis’s campaign promises is to decriminalize sex work and he has said he will run on a “sex positive” agenda. To promote his campaign, Itkis made an adult movie and uploaded it to his Pornhub account.
Itkis has a bio on Pornhub where he describes himself as “Not married. No kids. Not celibate. Atheist.” According to The Sun, Itkis stars alongside porn star Nicole Sage in the clip – which lasts 13 minutes.
Sage confirms that she consents to the movie and is “not under the influence of drugs or alcohol.” Itkis then confirms that both he and Sage and have tested for STI’s (sexually transmitted infections) and that a safe word of “stop” has been agreed.
Sage also has an Only Fans account and is a regular on both Instagram and Snapchat, describing herself as “Your naughty, online girlfriend.”
Itkis said he would turn his movie, which is titled “Bucket List Bonanza,” into “a conversation piece” which would showcase his commitment to the cause.
“If I would just talk about it, it wouldn’t demonstrate my commitment to the issue. And the fact I actually did it was a huge learning experience, and it actually influenced items on my platform,” Itkis said.
Itkis’s website says that if were to be elected, he would take a “sex positive approach,” including legalizing sex work.
The website goes on to say that “men should not be required to support biological children without prior agreement.” He also expressed his support for abortion, saying that he believes people should have a “right to NOT become a parent in case of pregnancy” and would attempt to “redefine [the] abortion debate as a right to unplanned sex.”
Itkis also said that prior to this short clip with Sage, he has never been filmed having sex before.
“I’m kind of a nerd who doesn’t like to be the center of attention if I can avoid it. But I thought the issues I’m trying to address are so important … I wanted to have my issues talked about in some way,” Itkis said.
-
Civilization5 days agoEnd the Filibuster – Or Stop Pretending To Govern
-
Education4 days agoIgnoring the Science: The Curious Case of Cell Phone Bans
-
Civilization4 days agoA Better U.S. Strategy for Greenland Than Annexation
-
Executive3 days agoWaste of the Day: Utah University Trustees Don’t Know Their Job
-
Education5 days agoA Solid Core Enlivens Free Speech and Viewpoint Diversity
-
Civilization3 days agoTrump’s Longest Speech, His Shortest Margin for Error
-
Civilization1 day agoState of the Union – a response
-
Executive4 days agoWaste of the Day: $8 Water Filter Costs the Government $156

Which one is worse or better? Are any better people running that these two?