Executive
Waste of the Day: U.S.-Funded International Groups Don’t Have to Report Fraud
The U.S. funded several international organizations and did not require any of them to report fraud in the year of the election.
The U.S. funded several international organizations and did not require any of them to report fraud in the year of the election.
Topline: The State Department did not have consistent oversight requirements for $5.7 billion it contributed to the United Nations and other international organizations in 2024, according to an audit released by the agency’s inspector general on Jan. 15.
International organizations don’t have sufficient oversight
Key facts: State Department policy recommends that all contributions to international organizations require the recipients to follow U.S. law and executive orders, avoid sending money to terrorist organizations and undergo regular audits.
The inspector general reviewed 18 contributions the U.S. made and found the policy was applied “inconsistently.” For example, some grants did not require the recipients to report fraud or comply with U.S. audits. Oftentimes, the State Department relied on “non-binding commitments” to obtain financial information about how U.S. grants were spent. That included U.S. officials using friendships and “individual relationships” with UN workers to ask for documents.

If there is staff turnover or relationships deteriorate, financial information may be inaccessible in the future, “potentially increasing the risk that waste, fraud, abuse, and prohibited conduct may go undetected,” according to the inspector general.
The State Department’s grants had much weaker oversight language than grants from the U.S. Agency for International Development or the European Commission, a branch of the European Union. USAID and EU grants generally required fraud checks and audit compliance.
USAID has now mostly merged with the State Department, but they were separate agencies during the audit.
Search all federal, state and local salaries and vendor spending with the world’s largest government spending database at OpenTheBooks.com.
Voluntary funding?
Background: The oversight issues concerned “voluntary” international funding, as opposed to the $3.6 billion in “assessed” funding the U.S. was required to send to the UN and other international groups to maintain its membership.
The State Department also had limited oversight of the assessed funding, but that was impossible to avoid. UN rules and diplomatic immunity bar the U.S. from obtaining “detailed information” about how its membership dues are used, according to the audit.
The State Department sent a total of $9.3 billion to 131 international organizations in 2024. Nearly half of the money came from the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration.
Summary: Identifying fraud is not always easy, but merely requiring recipients of U.S. grants to report all fraud is a simple step towards safeguarding taxpayer funds
The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com.
This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.
Jeremy Portnoy, former reporting intern at Open the Books, is now a full-fledged investigative journalist at that organization. With the death of founder Adam Andrzejewki, he has taken over the Waste of the Day column.
-
Civilization3 days agoThe Theory and Practice of Sanctuary Cities and States
-
Civilization4 days agoThe Duke and the Dork
-
Civilization4 days agoAmerica Can’t Secure Its Future on Imported Minerals
-
Civilization5 days agoTrump Admits Nobel Peace Prize Wouldn’t Improve US Lives
-
Executive5 days agoExclusive: Trump OMB Launches Full Review of Federal Funds Sent to Blue States
-
Civilization4 days agoCompetition Coming for the SAT, ACT, AP, and International Baccalaureate
-
Civilization1 day agoThe Minnesota Insurrection
-
Civilization2 days agoSupreme Court Orders CA Dems To Justify Prop 50 Maps

