Guest Columns
Sarah Palin at CPAC
Twitters, emails, Facebook pages and cell phones were ablaze with fear and trepidation this past weekend. The clocks read 11:45 am, as the left began slithering out of their sweat soaked beds, reached for their first early (late) morning sedatives, and realized that it wasn’t a nightmare they had just experienced. At least one that they could be awoken from. Sarah Palin spoke.
And they were asking themselves and each other:
What could have gone wrong? Didn’t we attack this woman with everything we could muster? Didn’t we use every deceptive, slime filled play in the book, make up lie after lie, invade the privacy of her children, use them in sordid and vile jokes to rid ourselves of this, this person, this Sarah Palin? Didn’t we employ Hollywood, the news media and even those two airheads, Tina Fey and Alec Baldwin, to dispatch this enemy of progressive civilization?
To see, if you have not already seen it, what it is that has the left stepping out of little yellow puddles beneath their feet, check out Sarah Palin’s CPAC speech, embedded below. (Editor’s note: this embed carries a link to the playlist of all the speeches at CPAC.)
But, regressing back to the vacuous one, Tina Fey. In a clear indication of the left’s fear of Sarah Palin, they have once again rolled out this failing TV and movie star, to begin anew the effort to associate Sarah Palin with things she has never said. A cable station, which will go unmentioned here, has hired Fey to do several Sarah Palin impersonations, much like the ones that NBC financed as part of the Democrat’s Presidential Campaign.
Who is Tina Fey (other than not Sarah Palin)?
TPATH thought it might be a little interesting to actually find out about this Tina Fey. As we all have been told, she and Baldwin were the brains behind “30 Rock.” Well ladies and gentlemen, this is a fabrication even beyond what the left usually tries to pull off. A writer for the show, one who wishes to remain anonymous because he wishes to remain employed, has been quoted as saying both Alec and Tina are empty vessels. The idea or theme for “30 Rock” was indeed proposed by Tina. But that, if it was actually her idea or not, was the last thing she contributed to the show. In fact, this writer has said he often had to explain even the most mundane and uncomplicated themes to her.
Also, as long as we are discussing Tina’s brilliance, it has been reported that she Tweeted this
Those who use Twitter are dumb.
Now there’s something we can all agree with.
Tina Fey lays a bomb on SNL
[ezadsense midpost]
Continuing with Ms. Fey, who as you may not know, because most of us did not know who Fey was before Sarah Palin made her a star, her stint on Saturday Night Live was marked by the some of the lowest ratings in the history of SNL. Oh, and it might be informative, and a slight indication as to why she is back doing Sarah, the long awaited movie she stared in, opened and closed on the same weekend. The name of this dismal flop of a movie? Pertinently, it was called “Admission of Defeat.” Talk about prognostications.
Enough about Tina, since there really isn’t much there anyway. We suggest that if this latest effort at reviving her career is as successful as her movie, she could always try impersonating Alec Baldwin’s “dirty little pig” daughter. (His words, not ours.)
Reprinted from Tea Party Advocacy Tracking Hub
Editor’s note: here is Alec Baldwin’s outburst to his daughter, for when anyone dares accuse Mr. Kehoe of malicious fabrication:
[ezadsense leadout]
-
Clergy4 days ago
Faith alone will save the country
-
Civilization2 days ago
Elon Musk, Big Game RINO Hunter
-
Civilization3 days ago
Legacy media don’t get it
-
Constitution1 day ago
Biden as Feeble Joe – now they tell us
-
Executive2 days ago
Waste of the Day: Mismanagement Plagues $50 Billion Opioid Settlement
-
Civilization2 days ago
A Sometimes-Squabbling Conservative Constellation Gathers at Charlie Kirk Invitation
-
Civilization3 days ago
Republicans Should Use Article 5 To Protect Our Institutions
-
Civilization2 days ago
Leveraging the Defense Production Act to Stockpile Minerals
SJ Cottrell liked this on Facebook.
David Sullivan liked this on Facebook.
I did not know that Tina Fey had a movie, “Admission of Defeat”, which opened and closed on the same weekend. It’s remarkable that it’s title is so similar to her movie “Admission” which opens today, May 22, 2013. It sounds like “Admission” is an unremarkable rom-com that will have its fifteen minutes and then be utterly forgotten. I wonder what made “Admission of Defeat” such a stinker that it closed its opening weekend. When did that happen?
Yeah, got to admire that Sarah Palin.
Spotty record as mayor of Wasilla.
Fails as a VP candidate.
Quits on her voters & supporters as a half-term governor, failing to finish what she started.
Canceled reality show.
Fired from Fox News.
Questionable conservative parenting skills.
Hardcover books sitting on $2.99 clearance tables at book stores.
She’s not a conservative thought leader – she’s the Kim Kardashian of the right wing. Good for attracting the press and promoting her personal brand, but not producing anything of sctual value for anyone but herself.
Contrast her with a Phyllis Schlafly, for example, and it’s clear that her fans are more into style than substance.
Theresa Brooks liked this on Facebook.
Digg Patriots liked this on Facebook.
PolitiCollision liked this on Facebook.
Twitters, emails, Facebook pages and cell phones were ablaze with fear and trepidation this past weekend. The clocks read 11:45 am, as the left began slithering out of their sweat soaked beds, reached for their first early (late) morning sedatives, and realized that it wasn’t a nightmare they had just experienced. At least one that they could be awoken from. Sarah Palin spoke.
Ha! You could not be more wrong, because we actually agree on something: we both would love Sarah Palin to run for president. If she got the nomination of the GOP or a 3rd party, she would cause whichever Democrat running against her to win by a landslide. Outside of the Tea Party echo chamber, she is a toxic joke.
Didn’t you learn anything from 2008? She single-handedly turned a moderately close race into a shoo-in for Obama. Look at the polling: a gigantic jump in popularity to the McCain ticket when she was announced as running mate, then a steep drop as people started hearing what she had to say. I know, I know, you’ll just scream “media bias!!!!”, but why do you think that is going to change? Seems unlikely people will suddenly forget 2008 and support her in 2016.
Except for one thing: her campaign slogan today could be “See? I told you so.”
Except for one additional thing – Palin will likely never run for major office again. Maybe the Senate, but her ego is too big for the House, and she’s too much of a quitter to ever take on executive responsibility again. She’s demonstrated that she’d rather collect a payckeck for talking than doing.
It’s people like you who made her quit, by making it impossible for her to do her job.
Nobody made it “impossible” for Palin to do her job. Scott Walker went through far more pressure and an actual recall vote last year and he’s still on the job. Hockey moms are supposed to be tougher than that, right?
She just decided to walk away from her state and her supporters to cash in at the peak of her popularity. It was a shrewd move, because her family’s made millions since then. At the same time, her ranking in polls of Republicans and even conservatives as someone they’d actually want to serve has president has trended down.
She’s a talker, not a doer.
‘Except for one thing: her campaign slogan today could be “See? I told you so.”’
Again, I’d love for that to happen. Please, do everything in your power to get her to run. It would be a hilarious trainwreck.
The fact is, people were nervous back in 2008 about her relative inexperience, and she has almost no more experience now than she did 4 years ago. People saw how poorly she did in interviews and debates, and those videos haven’t gone anywhere. She’s beloved almost universally by the Tea Party, but near-reviled elsewhere (not to mention the Tea Party has lost most of its favor since 2008-2010). A catchy little slogan isn’t going to do much for her image.
That said, she probably won’t run for any office in 2014 or 2016 (as much as I might want her to). She had a much better opportunity in 2012, but didn’t. Why would she run now?
I note that no one from CNAV has yet bothered to explain the “Admission of Defeat” movie, which does not seem to exist.