Accountability
Facebook scraps ad targeting metrics based on race, politics, and other ‘sensitive’ topics
Facebook have announced it will stop letting advertisers use certain targeting options related to “sensitive” characteristics such as race, religion, sexual orientation, health causes, and political beliefs.
In the announcement, Facebook owner Meta said that, “Starting January 19, 2022, we will remove Detailed Targeting options that relate to topics people may perceive as sensitive, such as options referencing causes, organizations, or public figures that relate to health, race or ethnicity, political affiliation, religion, or sexual orientation.”
Examples include:
- Health causes (e.g., “Lung cancer awareness,” “World Diabetes Day,” “Chemotherapy”)
- Sexual orientation (e.g., “same-sex marriage” and “LGBT culture”)
- Religious practices and groups (e.g., “Catholic Church” and “Jewish holidays”)
- Political beliefs, social issues, causes, organizations, and figures
Meta, which makes most of its $86 billion in annual sales from advertising, said it’s making the “difficult decision” in an effort to stop advertisers from using ad targeting to discriminate against or otherwise harm users.
“We’ve heard concerns from experts that targeting options like these could be used in ways that lead to negative experiences for people in underrepresented groups,” Meta official Graham Mudd wrote in a blog post on Tuesday.
Meta is not eliminating targeting altogether. It will still allow advertisers to target ads based on age, gender, location and a slew of other interest categories that it doesn’t consider “sensitive.”
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Civilization4 days agoMaduro’s Capture: U.S. Foreign Policy in Latin America
-
Civilization5 days agoTrump Lashes Out at Supreme Court as Under ‘Foreign Influence’
-
Civilization5 days agoTrump Administration Led With the Wrong Agency in Minnesota
-
Guest Columns4 days agoA Bipartisan Fix for the Prescription Drug Market
-
Guest Columns3 days agoWaste of the Day: Thousands of Earmarks in Illinois State Budget
-
Education2 days agoIgnoring the Science: The Curious Case of Cell Phone Bans
-
Civilization2 days agoA Better U.S. Strategy for Greenland Than Annexation
-
Education3 days agoA Solid Core Enlivens Free Speech and Viewpoint Diversity

