Accountability
Georgia judge uncertain about Stacey Abrams’ request for unlimited campaign funds
A Georgia judge is still deliberating on a decision over whether to allow gubernatorial candidate Stacy Abrams to begin raising unlimited campaign funds under a new law signed by incumbent Governor Brian Kemp, who is also running for reelection.
Abrams filed in March to be allowed to access unlimited campaign donations the same way Kemp had been since he quietly signed a new law in May last year that allows him to form a leadership committee, a special political action committee that can coordinate with his own campaign to accept unlimited contributions. The law allows campaigns to avoid federal campaign donation limits.
US District Judge Mark Cohen told attorneys for Abrams on Monday he was unsure how to proceed because Abrams’ request would mean the judge would effectively have to rewrite the law.
Currently, the law allows for candidates running for certain offices to partake. Abrams has not been officially nominated yet, but her argument is that since the filing deadline for entering the race closed and she is the only Democrat running, she is automatically the candidate.
“The remedy you’re asking me to do, I’m uncomfortable with, because you’re asking me to rewrite the statute,” Cohen said. “The law of Georgia says she’s not the nominee.”
Abrams attorneys argued, “Every day we are not allowed to raise and the Kemp campaign is allowed to raise is a day we are on unequal footing,” as Kemp’s campaign continues to collect donations. The judge is expected to rule by the end of the week.
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Civilization4 days agoStealth, Sensors, and Staying Power: What the F-35 Just Proved—and What Comes Next
-
Executive4 days agoCitizen Sleuths Spotlight Red Flags Galore in Government Spending
-
Guest Columns5 days agoOklahoma’s Digital Future Will Be Built on Affordable, Reliable, Clean Energy Security
-
Civilization3 days agoDems Scramble After California Governor’s Debate Implodes
-
Executive4 days agoA Consent Decree for Freedom of Speech
-
Civilization4 days agoWaste of the Day: Cybersecurity Programmers Have Foreign Ties
-
Executive3 days agoAmerica’s $130 Trillion Blind Spot
-
Civilization2 days agoIran Could Reshape the Middle East and the Global Balance of Power


Why doesn’t she just follow the law as written as the current governor is apparently doing?