Accountability
Report: Grindr app sold users’ location-tracking data for years
The Wall Street Journal reported this week that the gay dating app Grindr was selling its users location-tracking data to advertisers for years, only stopping the practice in 2020.
Grindr, the dating app that tracks your location data to show you how close you are to another user for a potential meetup, was reportedly making its users location data available for purchase from 2017 to 2020.
The data, which reportedly did not reveal any users’ names or phone numbers, did use data so specific that it became possible to learn a user’s personal information such as their workplace, home address, and frequent stops.
The fear is that on an app tailored toward the LGBTQIA+ community, such specific information may be used to target them and put them in unsafe positions. The possibility exists for blackmail of those who are still not out, and violent attacks from anti-LGBTQIA+ activists.
“Since early 2020, Grindr has shared less information with ad partners than any of the big tech platforms and most of our competitors,” Grindr spokesperson Patrick Lenihan told WSJ. “The company has cut back on the amount of data they share—even paying the price of reduced ad quality and reduced revenue.”
Lenihan added, “The activities that have been described would not be possible with Grindr’s current privacy practices, which we’ve had in place for two years.”
Unfortunately, in spite of Grindr halting the sale of user data, historical data prior to 2020 may still be available, dating all the way back to 2017.
This is not the first time the app has come under fire for selling user information. In 2021 Norway’s Data Protection Authority fined Grindr 100 million Norwegian crowns – about 10 percent of the app’s global market value – for illegally selling user data.
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Civilization4 days agoWhy the Iran Campaign Fails the Powell Doctrine
-
Executive5 days agoWaste of the Day: $79M To Not Work
-
Civilization3 days agoSupreme Court Just Gave Mail-In Ballot Safeguards a Chance
-
Civilization4 days agoKilling the Archer: Why the Red Sea Crisis Demands an Offensive Counter-Strike Architecture
-
Civilization3 days agoAmerica Doesn’t Have an AI Problem. It Has a Competitiveness Problem.
-
Civilization2 days agoCandidates in Michigan’s 4th District Give Sharply Different Visions for Energy Affordability
-
Executive1 day agoData Center Backlash Becomes September Surprise
-
Civilization2 days agoAmerica at 250: The Post-War Years: Prosperity with Growing Pains

