Judicial
SCOTUS declines to hear arguments in Rhode Island fetal personhood case
The United States Supreme Court declined this week to hear a case out of Rhode Island challenging the state’s right to abortion law based on the belief that personhood begins at conception.
The underlying dispute, brought against the state of Rhode Island by two women on behalf of their unborn babies and the religious organization Catholics for Life, was unsuccessful in the Rhode Island Supreme Court.
The suit claimed the state had stripped the women’s unborn babies of their personhood by repealing an older law that stated life began at conception. The law was updated in 2019 with the enactment of the state’s Reproductive Privacy Act, which changed the law to align with the US Supreme Court’s Roe v Wade decision.
In the petition to SCOTUS, the plaintiffs ask the high court to reevaluate the 2019 state court decision in wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe earlier this year in its Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health ruling.
“As this court held in Dobbs, abortion laws are different from all others. Do unborn human beings, at any gestational age, have any rights under the United States Constitution?” the petition reads. “Or, has Dobbs relegated all unborn human beings to the status of persona non grata in the eyes of the United States Constitution — below corporations and other fictitious entities?”
The Supreme Court will not hear the case, however, in a move that avoids the court making any controversial decisions about abortion rights before next month’s midterm elections, in which abortion remains a hot button issue for voters.
A poll published on Tuesday showed over half of US voters are more motivated to vote in the midterms after the Supreme Court overturned Roe V Wade in June.
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Civilization4 days agoLow birth rate – does anyone get it?
-
Civilization4 days agoIsrael Thwarts External Threats While Amplifying Internal Ones
-
Accountability4 days agoVMI’s Integrity at Stake
-
Executive4 days agoWaste of the Day: Lil Wayne, Chris Brown Spent Covid Millions on Themselves
-
Accountability4 days agoThe Climate Agenda’s March Through the Institutions: Can It Be Stopped?
-
Civilization4 days agoJay Bhattacharya Will Bring Much-Needed Transparency to NIH
-
Civilization2 days ago‘It’s All Talk’: Trump Accuses Biden of Sabotaging ‘Smooth Transition’
-
Civilization2 days agoRGGI Is Unconstitutional, Harmful, and Useless
It is a State issue not a Federal issue. But people need to understand their are only two justification for terminating a pregnancy. The first is Ectopic pregnancy in which both the mother and child will die and the second is the child has already died in the womb. Consider, most women who get abortions, and men who want a women to end a pregnancy, don’t want to take responsibility for their actions and behaviors.