The Tucker Twitter Files?

Three days ago, Paul D. Thacker, author of “The Fauci Pharma Files,” released another thread. He called it the Tucker Twitter Files. In it he offered a new theory for Tucker Carlson’s abrupt departure from Fox News Channel. Which is: that he ran afoul of the World Health Organization and its allies. This doesn’t necessarily explain his departure, but it does suggest that pressure for it had been building in the Parag Agrawal days.

Latest on Tucker Carlson

Tucker Carlson was preparing his show for Monday (April 24) when word came down that his show would not air. Megyn Kelly dropped a rumor two days ago that Fox News carefully did not terminate Carlson.

They merely locked him out of his show – and kept him under a contract with 18 months to run. Fox wants him to “negotiate” his exit – and would prefer to dribble out a monthly stipend for the rest of the contract term, thus sidelining Tucker Carlson until after the Election of 2024. Tucker has “lawyered up” and has said nothing since his Wednesday night video.

But this is at total variance with the tale from other insiders that Fox News intended to cut Tucker off without another red penny. CNAV has no reason to suppose Megyn Kelly is lying. But whether she actually knows the truth is another matter.

Now Paul Thacker comes forward with yet another theory of the kinds of things with which Tucker was dealing.

The thread

Herewith the Tucker Twitter Files thread:

Reaction varies from positive to slightly skeptical. A German-language user left this message:

Translation (from Google Translate, through Twitter itself):

How Twitter censored an article by Tucker Carlson saying that spreading official info from the WHO that children should not be vaccinated against Covid can be censored, a recommendation that the WHO simply quietly removed.

This message reminds us of the “malinformation” definition that recalls our piece on State actors:

At first this looks like a minor episode in the saga of Tucker Carlson. Today he must somehow get out of an eighteen-month contract that pays him to stay quiet. Or rather: it forces him to stay quiet, and pays him to keep that legal. (That is, if Megyn Kelly’s information, and testimony, are both accurate.)

But could Rupert Murdoch have had another motive, in addition to making sure Donald Trump loses in 2024? Could he be hobnobbing with the World Health Organization? He has already tainted himself with ideological corruption with the Democratic Party. Why not with WHO, as they prepare a treaty to make themselves a one-world government?

At present no further information is available, either on the planned vote on the WHO Treaty, or the disposition of dangerous laboratory samples possibly in rebel hands in Sudan. But perhaps Rupert Murdoch wants to stop Tucker Carlson from investigating both of these at this critical juncture. In which case Tucker needs to break that contract now, and start investigating.