Connect with us

Executive

Trump, his enemies, and our enemies

Donald Trump has enemies on all sides, even within the Department of Homeland Security – and his enemies are the people’s enemies.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Published

on

As Election Season approaches, signs are multiplying that Donald J. Trump has some serious enemies. Those enemies go beyond one allegedly deranged young man whose family sanitized his house after he tried to kill Trump. America knew he had political enemies, but now knows that they will not shun murder to stop his reelection. The alliances he has made since the assassination attempt show why those enemies fear him to that degree. Americans should never forget this, because his enemies are our enemies.

Evidence for a setup of Trump in Butler

In an ideal world, the United States Secret Service would never let anyone get as close to Trump as Thomas Matthew Crooks got, with a gun. They should never have let him climb that rooftop, never let him squeeze off those rounds. As it is, one man is dead – not Trump himself, but someone who came to see him. And after an event like this, everyone in government should unite to find out who failed in duty, and why the would-be assassin made the attempt.

That is not happening. Instead, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has been running his own investigation. What he has found, in the last thirty-one days, tells us that Trump was the target of a conspiracy. He has always been the target of a conspiracy, but now we know that conspiracy tried to kill him. (Occam’s Razor tells us there can’t be more than one conspiracy – but Fleming’s Razor tells us that one exists.)

Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, and the third time it’s enemy action. Ian Fleming

Sen. Hawley shared his first revelations on the night of August 5, on the Fox News Channel. The Vigilant Fox shared the video in a long-form post, and Mike LaChance (The Gateway Pundit) gathered that post.

Secret Service Whistleblowers Describe Butler Trump Rally as a ‘Free-for-All’ Security Nightmare

Nobody was fired. The lead site agent responsible for the Trump security disaster continues to oversee security for political events.

Whistleblowers tell Sen. Josh Hawley that she, the lead site agent, was not enforcing normal security protocols and describe her as “inexperienced and incompetent.”

There was a failure to check IDs at the event, allowing unchecked access to secure areas.

Additionally, Homeland Security agents, many of whom had never worked a rally before, were primarily responsible for security instead of experienced Secret Service agents.

The Secret Service snipers communicated via text message without Wi-Fi, and the Secret Service itself was in a separate command center, far from the action.

According to Sen. Hawley, the Trump team “had concerns about this individual before for the Butler rally. Again, when she was assigned to Butler, the campaign was worried. They thought, ‘Uh oh, this has not gone well before.’ And my gosh, it didn’t go well that day.” The Vigilant Fox

That much the country knew thirty-one days ago, though no one seems to have paid attention.

Advertisement

Two-hour webinar – and the lead sniper let the assassin shoot

Yesterday Sen. Hawley revealed more. Those Homeland Security agents constituted the bulk of the protective force, such as it was, at the Butler Farm Fair. Furthermore, their training limited itself to a two-hour “webinar,” with no in-person instruction.

Sen. Hawley dashed off a furious letter to Secret Service Acting Director Ronald Rowe, expressing his displeasure. Jim Hoft (TGP) included a partial transcript (emphasis in the original):

Whistleblower allegations to my office report that the only training received by many HSI agents reassigned to work protective details is a single two-hour webinar on Microsoft Teams featuring pre-recorded videos… These videos were not substantive and their playback was frequently riddled with technical mishaps leaving the HSI agents ill-prepared for the protective mission to which they were newly assigned. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.)

Those “technical mishaps” consisted chiefly of picture-but-no-sound half the time. The senator quoted his whistleblower directly:

Imagine 1,000 people logging onto Microsoft Teams at the same time after being informed at the last minute that everyone needed to login individually. Once it got rolling, the Secret Service instructor couldn’t figure out how to get the audio working on the prerecorded videos [which I’m told are the same videos as last year]. All told, they restarted the videos approximately six times …. The content was not helpful. Unnamed Source as quoted by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.)

Nor, apparently, has the Secret Service updated their training materials yet, after the assassination attempt! But toward the end of his letter, Sen. Hawley shared what he believed was the worst problem:

Moreover, the latest whistleblower allegations contend HSI agents were pulled off child exploitation cases in order to serve on protective details for which they were unprepared. Sen. Hawley

The senator finished with five specific questions, addressing these allegations.

Advertisement

Even that isn’t the actual worst revelation. According to that, the lead sniper, in position in a building at stage right, “drew a bead” on Crooks. He then waited for Crooks to fire before firing himself. In short, Crooks drew first blood – literally.

Bob Hoge at RedState marked this security failure down to the tendency of progressives to ruin everything they touch. But if that’s true, why have President Biden and Vice-President Harris survived unscathed?

The Cheat Margin and Cheater’s Baseline

More likely, someone at the highest echelon of the executive branch wanted Trump to die. His survival puts the progressive and one-world agenda in greater peril than ever. That’s why identifying the Cheat Margin and Cheater’s Baseline becomes so vital.

The Cheat Margin consists of the votes an election cheater must manufacture or switch to win. Likewise, the Cheater’s Baseline is the total votes the cheater can persuade, scare, or bamboozle actual voters to cast. Cheater’s Baseline plus Cheat Margin equals total nominal vote for the cheater. Last night Patty McMurray (TGP) laid out a body of evidence of Democrats’ plans to cheat, and Republican efforts to prevent the cheat. The term cheat margin came up in an interview of evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein by Joe Rogan. According to X influencer Collin Rugg:

JUST IN: Bret Weinstein says there is a “cheat margin” in elections, says America owes Trump a debt of gratitude for proving it could be beaten.

The comment came after Weinstein argued that there is only a certain amount of democracy in America.

Joe Rogan and Weinstein discussed the JFK assassination and how it may have been an “interference” with democracy.

“One of the things that I’m trying to convince people of is that it’s not hopeless because they can cheat but it means that you have to succeed at a level that exceeds their capacity to erase it.”

“We owe Trump a huge debt of gratitude for proving something that I couldn’t have told you if it was true before he won the presidency… Which is, there is still enough democracy left in the system for something to upend the plan.” Collin Rugg

Beating the Cheat Margin takes two steps: lowering it directly, and lowering the Cheater’s Baseline. Reducing the Cheat Margin is the job of Officers of Election (poll workers) and Accredited Party Challengers (poll watchers). Good unit registrars emphasize electoral neutrality in the training of OOEs and their Chiefs, and in all official interactions. Bad election officials try to threaten one party or another not to apply for these jobs. As Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has done:

Advertisement

In addition, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has threatened prosecution of any officials who refuse to certify an election “on time.”

Allies of Trump lowering the Cheat Margin

On the other hand, the Arizona Republican Party and America First Legal are suing the State and every Arizona county, respectively, over the persistence of illegal-alien and otherwise ineligible voters on the rolls.

The AFL thread at one point embeds the start of an earlier thread referring to Maricopa County, Arizona’s most populous.

See also this thread on AFL’s initial threat of legal action, which the counties didn’t take seriously,

and this thread showing the Biden administration giving registration forms and Social Security numbers to illegal aliens.

Advertisement

Lastly, Gov. Greg Abbott (R-Texas) recently removed over a million dead, moved-out, felony-convict, and non-citizen voters from his State’s rolls.

That leaves the Cheater’s Baseline – but Kamala Harris is losing that, too. As reported earlier, Harris scheduled campaign stops in Minnesota, Virginia and New Hampshire. For the New Hampshire event, she bused in hundreds of people in 12 chartered buses – from Massachusetts!

Unaccountably, those buses didn’t get back to the rally on time, and that caused attendees to react in outrage.

To say nothing of Democratic State legislators – including legislative leadersdefecting to the Republican Party.

And furthermore, dissension in the ranks of the extended family of Running Mate Gov. Tim Walz (D-Minn.).

Advertisement

Election Season

Election Season (not Day) begins with the earliest of early voting. Depending on definition, this is either forty-six or fifty days in advance of the traditional Election Day. (The advocacy group Vote.org keeps a calendar.) This year’s Season begins September 15, for absentee ballot application availability in some Pennsylvania counties. The first in-person early voting begins on September 19 (in Minnesota and South Dakota).

The existence of early voting requires honest voters to use it, or risk losing their votes to the cheaters. Ideally that means voting in person – in those States that still allow it. It also means making election integrity a campaign issue.

The real campaign issue is liberty v. tyranny. Jonathan Turley warns us that a Harris-Walz administration would destroy freedom of speech. That’s not only an “American Progressive” stance but a globalist one-world stance also. That’s why the globalists tried to kill Trump, and will still try to cheat him of another election. For the sake of freedom lovers everywhere, that must not happen.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
+ posts

Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.

Advertisement
Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Trending

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x