Connect with us


Health care reform bill recusal motion 2



The Constitution, which sets forth the principle of rule of law, defines what is unconstitutional, and guarantees freedom of speech and other liberties of a Constitutional republic, and also describes the impeachment power. (How many know of the Jewish roots of this document?) Hypocrisy threatens Constitutional government. Could Israel use a constitution like this? More to the point: would a Convention of States save it, or destroy it? (Example: civil asset forfeiture violates the Constitution.) Quick fixes like Regulation Freedom Amendments weaken it. Furthermore: the Constitution provides for removing, and punishing, a judge who commits treason in his rulings. Furthermore, opponents who engage in lawfare against an elected President risk breaking the Constitution.

Two New Jersey men behind the most comprehensive legal challenge to the health care reform bill are raising the stakes: they want two Justices to recuse themselves.

Status of health care reform bill challenges

The case of Florida ex rel. Bondi et al. v. HHS et al. gets all the media attention today. The Supreme Court has scheduled a full day of oral argument on that case in March. There they will hear questions of standing, and the related question of ripeness. (A case is ripe when the damage involved is happening today or is about to happen.) They will also hear questions of constitutionality (but only of the minimal coverage mandate and of mandates on the States) and severability.

Purpura v. Sebelius (Docket No. 11-7275) raises nineteen Constitutional and statutory issues in fifteen counts. Nick Purpura and Donald R. Laster Jr also ask the Court to decide whether lower courts were too quick to dismiss their claims for lack of standing. They also are asking whether the government, in its own haste to brush the case aside, might have forfeited on key counts.

One of those counts, Count Six, is the reason for today’s motion.

A question of citizenship and authority

Barack Obama: was he authorized to sign the health care reform bill?

Barack H. Obama. Photo: Pete Souza, January 13, 2009

Count Six, in essence, says that the man now holding office as President, Barack H. Obama, is not and was never authorized to sign the health care reform bill, or any bill, into law. The reason: his father was a British colonial subject at the time of his birth. And therefore, according to multiple existing Supreme Court precedents that the Court has never reversed, Obama is not a natural-born citizen. Therefore he is not the President of the United States.

The problem: if he is not President, then he had no authority to appoint Justices of the Supreme Court, or any lower court. That means, for example, that Judges Joseph Greenaway and Thomas Vanaskie, who now sit on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, should be out of jobs. But this also applies to Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.


Today, Purpura and Laster filed a motion to the Supreme Court, asking that Justices Kagan and Sotomayor recuse themselves from any consideration of whether to grant certiorari to them (that is, to “take the case”), or, if the Court grants certiorari, to decide the case. (The Court accepted the petition on November 9 and gave the government thirty calendar days to respond.)

Title 28, United States Code, Section 455, disqualifies any judge having a financial interest in the outcome of the case. It also disqualifies a judge who has advised a party to a case in any way.

Purpura and Laster say in their motion that no financial stake can be any more basic than owing one’s job to a party. That is the case with Kagan and Sotomayor.

The original plaintiffs in the Florida case are now moving to disqualify Justice Kagan because she closely advised the government (as Solicitor General) during the health care reform bill debate. (And also because she cheered, in writing, the prospects for the health care reform bill passing Congress.) Purpura, in an interview with CNAV, scoffed at such technicalities. “Why play games with whether she advised them or not, when you need only realize that, if Obama is not the President, she’s out of a job?” he said.

Purpura and Laster also want to apply this standard to Judges Greenaway and Vanaskie in the Third Circuit. If the Supreme Court remands the case to the Third Circuit, this would force a new three-judge panel to re-examine their appeal.


Featured image: the Constitution of the United States. Photo: National Archives.


[amazon_carousel widget_type=”ASINList” width=”500″ height=”250″ title=”” market_place=”US” shuffle_products=”True” show_border=”False” asin=”B00375LOEG, 0451947673, 0800733940, 0062073303, 1595230734, 1936218003, 0981559662, 1935071874, 1932172378″ /]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
+ posts

Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eugene Garner

How many ways does Obama have to violate the Constitution before he is impeached for:

Engaging in wars without the declaration of Congress

Not honoring his oath to OBEY and protect the Constitution

Condoning the Patriots Act

Involvement in the Fast and Furious scandal

Packing his cabinet with Goldman Sachs cronies

And on and on…….

Not a citizen??? that’s the least of the crime.


This is truly a David versus Goliath spectacle. What I find interesting is how people so easily dismiss the notion that Obama did not meet the requirement to hold the office because he is not a natural born citizen, as if that is just small potatoes so there is no need to bring it up. I would bet that Al Capone, as well as many other observers, laughed at the idea that Capone was being tried for tax evasion when he was guilty of many more heinous crimes. Tax evasion may have been small potatoes, but it effectively ended Al Capone’s career as a vicious criminal.

My guess is that Al Capone didn’t see tax evasion as small potatoes after a few years in federal prison. It seems that failure to meet a basic requirement to hold the office may appear to some to be small potatoes, just as the rock that David used to slay Goliath probably seemed like a pebble.

Whether or not Obama is the greatest President we have ever had, love him, hate him, or somewhere in between, if he was not eligible to be President, he should be removed.

[…] Recusal motion 2 […]

[…] Recusal motion 2 […]

[…] Recusal motion 2 […]


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x