Guest Columns
The Humanitarian Hoax of the United Nations: Killing America With Kindness – hoax 36
The United Nations has pulled a humanitarian hoax on the world for 77 years. It has abandoned working for peace and now works for world government.
The Humanitarian Hoax is a deliberate and deceitful tactic of presenting a destructive policy as altruistic. The humanitarian huckster presents himself as a compassionate advocate when in fact he is the disguised enemy.
The United Nations, a one-world plan from the start
The United Nations is an institutional humanitarian hoax promoting its destructive Agenda 2030 infrastructure for one-world government as the altruistic advancement of world peace. This is how it works.
First, a little history. The United Nations began as a wartime alliance between the allies against Nazi Germany. President Franklin D. Roosevelt suggested using the name United Nations to refer to the allies of World War II.
The original United Nations declaration
In 1942, the declaration of the allied United Nations articulated its purpose and was signed by twenty-six sovereign governments:
A JOINT DECLARATION BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS, CHINA, AUSTRALIA, BELGIUM, CANADA, COSTA RICA, CUBA, CZECHOSLOVAKIA, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, EL SALVADOR, GREECE, GUATEMALA, HAITI, HONDURAS, INDIA, LUXEMBOURG, NETHERLANDS, NEW ZEALAND, NICARAGUA, NORWAY, PANAMA,POLAND, SOUTH AFRICA, YUGOSLAVIA
The Governments signatory hereto,
Having subscribed to a common program of purposes and principles embodied by the Joint Declaration of the President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister of Great Britain dated August 14, 1941, known as the Atlantic Charter,
Being convinced that complete victory over their enemies is essential to defend life, liberty, independence and religious freedom, and to preserve human rights and justice in their own lands as well as in other lands, and that they are now engaged in common struggle against savage and brutal forces seeking to subjugate the world,
DECLARE:
(1) Each Government pledges itself to employ its full resources, military or economic, against those members of the Tripartite Pact [Germany, Italy, Japan] and its adherents with which such government is at war.
(2) Each Government pledges itself to cooperate with the Governments signatory hereto and not to make a separate armistice or peace with the enemies. The forgoing declaration may be adhered to by other nations which are, or which may be, rendering material assistance and contributions in the struggle for victory over Hitlerism.
Growth of the United Nations
By 1945, 21 more sovereign nations had joined these United Nations by signing the Declaration. The United Nations replaced the failed League of Nations and became a permanent international organization with the constructive mission to provide peace among sovereign nations through cooperation and communication. What happened?
The structure of the United Nations
The structure of the original United Nations was fifty-one sovereign nations organized by regions, including the five permanent members of the Security Council:
- United States
- Britain
- China
- Russia
- France
From 1945-1965 six non-permanent members rotated in and out of the Security Council – the six seats were organized and apportioned by regions. During that period there were Latin American seats (2), Commonwealth seat (1), Eastern European & Asian seat (1), Middle Eastern seat (1), and Western seat (1).
From 1965-present the non-permanent member seats were expanded to ten and the regions adjusted to include African nations and the Caribbean Group. African Group + Asia-Pacific Group including Arab nations seats (5), Latin American and Caribbean Group seats (2), Western European and Other Groups seats (2), Eastern European Group seat (1).
The structure/form of the United Nations is as significant as its content/policies – because the form defines the power awarded to implement UN policies through its principal units and system agencies. We will examine both.
The principal components
The UN is structured with six principal components:
- General Assembly
- Security Council
- Economic and Social Council
- Trusteeship Council
- International Court of Justice
- UN Secretariat
The UN System agencies include the World Bank Group, the World Health Organization, the World Food Program, UNESCO, and UNICEF. The United Nations has become a comprehensive global organization influencing public policy world wide. So, what is the problem?
New and more deadly mission
The United Nations has abandoned its initial mission to encourage world peace for sovereign nations through cooperation and communication. The United Nations has redefined itself as a globalized body promoting peace through one internationalized world without borders. The reorganization features one government, one flag, one culture, one currency, one language, one educational curriculum, and one ruling elite. This rejection of the sovereignty of nations including the unique cultures and traditions of individual countries is an egregious power grab by the globalist elite who will return the world to the feudal structure of masters and slaves – it is the New World Order which is decades old.
An aristocrat’s dream…
English aristocrat Bertrand Russel described the imperious power grab in his unapologetic 1952 book The Impact of Science on Society. Russell argued that the solution to the Malthusian dilemma of not enough natural resources to support the growing world population is the elitist New World Order. Russell’s imagined New World Order is being implemented by the comprehensive UN Agenda 2030 using the mechanisms of its system agencies including:
…and making it happen
- UN Paris Agreement – Redistribution of wealth disguised as Climate Change.
- UN Global Compact For Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration – Mass immigration of populations with hostile norms designed to collapse the traditional Judeo-Christian infrastructure of sovereign Western countries including the United States.
- UN Global Education Initiative – Educational indoctrination provided by propagandized textbooks, delivered through Google’s Chromebooks, and augmented with curated globalist Google searches on the Internet.
- Anti-Christian indoctrination included in Common Core and distributed through UN globalized educational initiatives.
- Anti-Semitic indoctrination included in Common Core and distributed through UN globalized educational initiatives.
- Pro-Muslim indoctrination included in Common Core and distributed through UN globalized educational initiatives.
The United Nations and its long-term project
The announced and demonstrated goal of today’s United Nations is to collapse the sovereignty of nations and to reform the nation states into a globalized world order under one world government implemented by the United Nations itself. It is a long-term project. Globalized educational indoctrination prepares the world’s young people for citizenship in the New World Order. The propagandized curriculum is designed to produce voters who will eventually vote for one world government – no bullets required.
Wealth redistribution, massive immigration, and educational indoctrination are the three main tactics in the United Nations war on the sovereign nation states of the world.
Consider the UN Agenda 2030 and its 17 Sustainable Goals All promote the globalist elite’s New Old World Order – for our own good of course. The globalist elite have just repackaged feudalism and are busy putting lipstick on a pig and selling it worldwide through their six principal components and the globalized UN integrated System Agencies.
Democratic? Or not? No matter
There are 193 member states in the United Nations and according to Freedom House only 87 are full-fledged democracies. This means that the majority of UN member states are not democracies. One state whether democratic or undemocratic = one vote. The Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) that works to promote interests of Muslims worldwide, is the largest bloc in the non-aligned movement and G-77. This means that theocracies ruled by sharia law exert enormous influence at the United Nations. The effort to criminalize criticism of Mohammed as hate speech worldwide is an effort of the OIC.
Freedom of speech: first to go
The United Nations has launched a massive new anti-hate speech campaign introduced by former socialist Prime Minister of Portugal now current UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on 6.18.19. The campaign sounds humanitarian – political hoaxes always do. The reality is that socialists at the United Nations, in the United States, and around the world have a politically specific idea of what hate speech is – anything that disagrees with their socialist narrative. That poses a problem for nation states and citizens who prefer their national sovereignty, property rights, free markets, and individual liberties.
Free speech is universally the first liberty that is eliminated in any oppressive government in the world – the United Nations is trying to drive the world toward one world government and considers any opposition to its objective to be hate speech. The once extraordinary voice of sovereignty and freedom is now the tyrannical promoter of one world government implemented through their own globalized infrastructure.
An enemy of sovereignty
The original mission of the United Nations was to protect the peace and sovereignty of the nation states against Hitlerism. The United Nations is now the enemy of the sovereignty of nation states and is diametrically opposed to traditional American values. Globalism rejects national sovereignty, defensible borders, independence, personal liberty, the meritocracy, and the authority of the United States Constitution which provides American citizens guarantees of free speech, separation of church and state, and the mechanisms for legal immigration into the country.
Free speech worth protecting from the United Nations
The United Nations cannot be allowed to restrict free speech in the name of humanitarian altruism – it is a humanitarian hoax of colossal proportions. Free speech is the foundation of all freedoms – without free speech there is no freedom. We cannot allow anyone or any organization including the discredited United Nations to dictate policy and supersede the United States Constitution. The United Nations and its like-minded organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood, the socialists leading the US Democrat party, Google, Facebook, or Twitter, cannot be permitted to determine what is and what is not allowable free speech in America. Free speech is the essential foundation of freedom guaranteed by our precious Constitution.
The Islamist danger
The Islamists in the African Group and the Asia-Pacific Group including Arab nations claim that Islam is peaceful. Peace for an Islamist means when all the world is Muslim ruled by sharia law. The globalists at the United Nations claim their Agenda 2030 including its latest anti-hate speech campaign is peaceful. Peace for the United Nations’ globalists means when all the world is internationalized and united under one world government ruled by themselves.
If we allow the United nations, the Muslim Brotherhood, or their quislings to restrict our free speech, then we are collapsing the foundation of our constitutional republic. We can never allow an international organization like the UN to dictate policy to the United States of America. If we do, we have surrendered our Constitutional freedoms and become part of their feudal one world government.
What can stop it now: the veto
The fifteen member UN Security Council is charged with maintaining peace and security among nations. The Security Council has the power to make binding decisions called resolutions that member states are required to carry out under the terms of the UN Charter. The five permanent members each have the power to veto any resolution. This means that even if fourteen members of the Security Council support a resolution – one permanent member can veto it.
The United Nations policies and resolutions support the New World Order that rejects national sovereignty. This means that the president of the United States who appoints our ambassador to the United Nations can still be the deciding vote. One US vote on the Security Council can intervene and halt the egregious movement of the United Nations to deny national sovereignty and create one world government. Or, one US vote can help install one world government ruled by the globalist elites under the auspices of the United Nations.
A pivotal election
The 2020 American presidential election is pivotal in determining the future of America and the future of the world. A vote for any of the Democrat party’s candidates facilitates the United Nations and its objective of one world government. A vote for America-first President Donald Trump insures a free, sovereign, and powerful America. Hopefully, in his second term, President Donald Trump will consider withdrawing the United States from the failed and menacing United Nations.
I am an American citizen who rejects Islamic efforts striving to establish a worldwide Muslim caliphate ruled by Islamic sharia law. I am an American citizen who rejects United Nations’ efforts striving to establish an internationalized world ruled by one world government. I am an American citizen who believes in the United States Constitution, the American flag, and the republic for which it stands. I am an American citizen who will exercise my precious right to vote and cast my 2020 ballot for America-first President Donald Trump and his efforts striving to keep America great, free, and sovereign. God bless America!
See also
The above article also appears here at Pundicity.com and at the author’s own website.
For further insight into the history of the United Nations, see “What is the Real Purpose of the UN” by Sue M. Long.
To see what the United Nations might become, and the kind of enforcement arm it might gain, see “Christiana Figueres’ Climate Manifesto.”
See also these other articles on this site.
Linda Goudsmit is the devoted wife of Rob and they are the parents of four children and the grandparents of four. She and Rob owned and operated a girls’ clothing store in Michigan for forty years before retiring to the sunny beaches of Florida. A graduate of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Linda has a lifelong commitment to learning and is an avid reader and observer of life. She is the author of the philosophy book Dear America: Who’s Driving the Bus? and its political sequel, The Book of Humanitarian Hoaxes: Killing America with ‘Kindness’, along with numerous current affairs articles featured on her websites lindagoudsmit.com and goudsmit.pundicity.com. The Collapsing American Family: From Bonding to Bondage and her new release, Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier––Reality Is, complete Linda’s quadrangle of insightful books that connect the philosophical, ideological, political, and psychological dots of globalism's War on America and individual sovereignty.
Linda believes the future of our nation requires reviving individualism, restoring meritocracy, and teaching critical-thinking skills to children again. Her illustrated children’s book series, Mimi’s Strategy, offers youngsters new and exciting ways of solving their problems and having their needs met. Mrs. Goudsmit believes that learning to think strategically rather than reacting emotionally is a valuable skill that will empower any child throughout his or her life. Plus, in Linda’s words, “I have yet to meet the child who would prefer a reprimand to a kiss.”
-
Civilization3 days ago
Is the Left Preparing for War If Trump Wins?
-
Civilization4 days ago
Theft – the left’s theory of government
-
Civilization3 days ago
Virginia wins – noncitizens excluded
-
Civilization2 days ago
Election integrity flaws nationwide
-
Civilization4 days ago
As Liz Cheney Slams Donald Trump’s Character, Her Integrity Comes Under Fire
-
Civilization22 hours ago
Harris campaign rapidly collapsing
-
Civilization3 days ago
Harris Echoes Biden’s Democracy Warning in ‘Closing Argument’
-
Guest Columns4 days ago
Waste of the Day: Miss. Lawmaker Brings Pork Spending Home