January 6 – NYT reporter blows the gaffe

Regular readers of Conservative News and Views know our position on the January 6 event. It was a false-flag pseudo-operation, and the “January 6 Committee” exists only to write bills of attainder and an ex post facto law against Donald J. Trump and all who voted for him. (That is, whether their votes counted as voting for Donald J. Trump – or not.) Now comes proof! James O’Keefe of Project Veritas has a reporter for The New York Times admitting the false flag.

Review of the January 6 event

To set the context of this story, let us review what we know about the January 6 event. First, we know about Ray Epps, who infamously exhorted people to go

Into the Capitol! Into the Capitol!

Which prompted a chant of,

Fed, Fed, Fed, Fed, Fed, Fed, Fed, Fed!

We also know about “Fence Cutter Bulwark,” who cut down fences and tore up signs reading AREA CLOSED. And, of course, “Scaffold Commander,” who exhorted people to “Move forward!”

None of these three went to prison for what they did or said. The “House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack” tried to whitewash Epps’ involvement. These and other stories appear at this keyword and on this list.

And now … a reporter, tasked to play up the January 6 event as an attack on American “democracy,” admits that the entire narrative is a fraud. And that he and his newspaper played a key role in it.

Meet Matthew Rosenberg

Matthew Rosenberg is the national security correspondent for The New York Times. At about the time CNAV was covering the investigation that revealed Ray Epps’ role, Rosenberg was denying that the FBI sent any informants to that crowd. He called the very notion “the next big lie,” the first being that the Democrats stole the Election of 2020. Nor is this the first time he has shaded the truth. In 2018 he and many others promoted the Russia Hoax. And for that bit of shady business, he actually shared the Pulitzer Prize! Reason enough, we say, to call it the Phew-litzer Prize instead.

And then he sat down to lunch with someone, and did what so many forgers and bunco artists do. He let his pride cloud his judgment, and boasted that all of it was an “overreaction.”

From the horse’s mouth

There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.

It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!

I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like “Oh my God it was so scary!” I’m like, “f*ck off!”

I’m like come on, it’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up but I kind of want to be like, “dude come on, you were not in any danger.”

These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.

They were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.

There’s a real internal tug-of-war between … the reasonable people and some of the crazier leftist[s].

What, then, can we infer from those remarks? Two things above all:

1. January 6 was a false-flag pseudo-operation. Worse, it involved not only the three agents provocateurs about which CNAV has reported, but orders-of-magnitude more.
2. Other than someone cutting away fences, pulling up signs, and exhorting people to break the law through no fault of their own, the event posed … no threat! This is worse than “AOC” saying she was cowering in her office – in a House Office Building. We’re talking about someone on the scene who admits that any danger of bodily harm was minimal.

Gotcha! Now what have you to say about January 6?

Mr. O’Keefe published his story last night. Today he released this video in which he confronted Rosenberg, after identifying himself.

Here Rosenberg says he will “absolutely” stand by his comments. But when Mr. O’Keefe shares some of the more sensational quotes from him, he then refuses. Furthermore, he pleads the usual entrapement defense: “You’ve got me in a bar, in a social situation.” Excuse us, but that does not answer whether he spoke truth or falsehood in that “social situation.”

More than likely, the interpretation of “freedom of the press” and “double jeopardy” will stop any future Attorney General from prosecuting Rosenberg for what he wrote. But what he said, tells us all we need to know.

It’s time to drop all charges for anyone at the January 6 event who was not an FBI informant. At the same time, those people should face prosecution. When you frame someone, you make yourself liable for the punishment you wish to visit upon him. As the late Vincent T. Bugliosi pointedly observed in Outrage: The Five Reasons O. J. Simpson Got Away With Murder.

For further insight, see Steven Turley, Ph.D., interpret Mr. Rosenberg’s remarks for himself.