Accountability
Brooklyn gay couple files complaint against city’s denial of IVF benefits available to heterosexual couples
A gay couple from Brooklyn has filed a complaint against the city after coverage for their in vitro fertilization process was denied based what they allege is a discriminatory requirement.
Corey Briskin and Nicholas Maggipinto planned to have a family together over a decade ago. They became engaged in 2014 and married in 2016. “I know that neither one of us would have considered marrying the other if there was no interest in starting a family and having children,” Briskin said.
Their plans included IVF, where an egg is combined with sperm by specialists in a lab, and then hire a surrogate who would carry the baby to term.
When Briskin took a job as a city attorney at the New York County District Attorney’s Office in Manhattan in 2017, the couple encountered an unexpected roadblock. The city’s insurance policy did not cover IVF treatments for gay male couples.
The policy defines “infertility” as “the inability to conceive after 12 months of unprotected intercourse” or after 12 cycles of intrauterine insemination, or IUI, over 12 months.” Briskin and Maggipinto say the definition technically excludes gay male couples, who are unable to fulfill the requirements as they are written as all other couples can.
The complaint filed by the couple and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says “the City and its insurers have interpreted [the definition] to mean intercourse between a man and a female, thereby making it impossible for Mr. Briskin and Mr. Maggipinto to satisfy the definition.”
“New York City has been a leader in offering IVF treatments for any city employee or dependent covered by the city’s health plan who has shown proof of infertility, and our policies treat all people covered under the program equally, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation,” said a spokesperson for New York City Mayor Eric Adams. “The city will review the details of the complaint.”
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Clergy4 days ago
Faith alone will save the country
-
Civilization2 days ago
Elon Musk, Big Game RINO Hunter
-
Civilization3 days ago
Legacy media don’t get it
-
Constitution1 day ago
Biden as Feeble Joe – now they tell us
-
Executive3 days ago
Waste of the Day: Mismanagement Plagues $50 Billion Opioid Settlement
-
Civilization3 days ago
A Sometimes-Squabbling Conservative Constellation Gathers at Charlie Kirk Invitation
-
Civilization3 days ago
Leveraging the Defense Production Act to Stockpile Minerals
-
Civilization4 days ago
Republicans Should Use Article 5 To Protect Our Institutions
The first thing to do is to use the correct words. The word “gay” means happy. It is not a description of behavior or sexual attraction. The proper term is “sodomite”. They are not infertile so they do not qualify. Two women sodomites would not qualify either.