Accountability
Mask mandate didn’t work against COVID-19 in LA, say doctors from USC and UCLA
A group of doctors from USC and UCLA penned a letter saying the statewide mask mandate in California was ineffective against COVID-19.
The letter, which was sent to Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, was obtained by the LA Daily News.
The letter was signed by was signed by Dr. Jeffrey D. Klausner, clinical professor of medicine, population and public health sciences at USC’s Keck School of Medicine; Neeraj Sood, professor of public policy at USC’s Sol Price School of Public Policy; James E. Enstrom, retired professor of epidemiology at UCLA; Dr. Noah Kojima, senior resident for internal medicine at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine; Dr. Catherine A. Sarkisian of UCLA’s Geffen School; James E. Moore, II, professor at USC’s Viterbi School of Engineering; Dr. Gabe Vorobiof, associate professor of medicine and cardiology at UCLA Geffen School of Medicine; and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, professor at UCLA’s Anderson School.
The letter is said to have played a role in the decision not to re-institute the mandate in Los Angeles County last month.
“Any indication that the county would soon be moving to the medium community level would be a good reason to not move forward with universal indoor masking, which is what we are doing today. We will be pausing and not moving forward at this time,” Public Health Director Barbara Ferrer said last month citing a decrease in infections and hospitalizations.
Some of the same doctors wrote an op-ed for the Orange County Register on July 22. “Now in mid-2022 we have much better data. Exhaustive tracking of in-school COVID spread was indistinguishable with and without student mask use in studies in Spain, a conclusion repeated in two separate COVID waves.”
They continued, “Studies of student masking with control groups in Georgia, North Dakota, Finland and the UK have all found the same lack of any clear benefit. One randomized controlled trial showed no significant benefit to the mask wearer, and a second randomized trial found a slight benefit (and only in older adults) that was not reproduced with a different analysis of the same data.”
During an interview last Thursday, Dr. Klausner said that there was a small rise in cases after the mask mandate was implemented, however he did acknowledge that the mandate could have stopped a steeper rise. “People might argue it might have risen faster,” he said, but added, “By the naked eye, there was no clear discernible effect of mask use.”
Kathryn Bargar, who is a supervisor at the Los Angeles County Board, said that she is definitely not opposed to people wearing masks as an extra layer of protection, however Bargar believes that the state should no longer force people to do so. “I do believe masking is another line of defense in protecting yourself and others,” Barger said. “But as far as mandating: It’s time has come and gone.”
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Executive3 days ago
Analysis: California’s Shift to the Right Lost on Newsom
-
Constitution4 days ago
The Deep State Ten-point Cleanse
-
Human Interest5 days ago
The Blame Games begin
-
Civilization3 days ago
Unprofessional conduct
-
Civilization2 days ago
FEMA aid withholding – policy?
-
Civilization19 hours ago
Federal government taking shape for next year
-
Civilization3 days ago
Diminishing ‘The Endarkenment’
-
Civilization3 days ago
The Two Thanksgivings Between Halloween and Christmas