News
Animal rights activists decry Michigan city’s decision to allow religious animal sacrifices

Animal rights groups are weighing in on a Michigan city’s decision to allow animal sacrifices for religious purposes, saying the decision violates health codes and promotes animal cruelty.
PETA spoke out after the Hamtramck City Council voted on Tuesday to allow residents to carry out animal sacrifices for religious purposes. About half the city’s residents are Muslim, according to city officials, and often sacrifice animals like lambs and sheep as part of their religion. The meat is then shared among the community.
“At PETA, we don’t believe in harming animals for any reason, and we encourage anyone who’s bothered by this to take a look at what goes on in any slaughterhouse,” said PETA spokesperson Ashley Byrne to Fox News.
“We have to think about the fact that children are often exposed to these religious rituals,” she said. “These animals’ throats are slashed and their heads are manually torn from their bodies.”
The council’s ruling allows residents to sacrifice animals on their own residential property.
The law reads, “No person shall slaughter any animal in the City except for properly licensed commercial facilities in the business of food preparation or police in the course of their duties or as permitted by law.”
Mayor Pro Tem Mohammed Hassan argued the law will not result in health code violations and will protect the city from lawsuits for violating religious freedom, according to the Detroit Free Press.
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Civilization1 day ago
Tariffs and misunderstandings
-
Civilization3 days ago
Populism, Political Violence, and the Collapse of Civil Discourse in America
-
Civilization4 days ago
NATO Is a Corpse – and Trump Might Be Its Undertaker
-
Guest Columns5 days ago
Waste of the Day: Throwback Thursday: Paying Spanish-American War Tax a Century Later
-
Executive3 days ago
Waste of the Day: The Entitlement Spending Doomsday Clock is Ticking
-
Civilization4 days ago
Somebody Finally Got the Message About the Panama Canal
-
Executive3 days ago
Resetting the order
-
Executive2 days ago
Trump and the Economics of Statecraft
And keep in mind “PETA” is also hypocritical. One thing people need to keep in mind is that Islam is not a religion but a theocracy – a government with a religious component. No Islam citizen has any authority to have Islam’s laws in the US. If one is an Islam citizen they have no fealty to the US and can not be US citizens.