Legislative
Missouri House draws criticism with new restrictions on female lawmakers’ dress code

The Missouri House of Representatives implemented a new professional dress code for female lawmakers in the state requiring them to wear jackets or cardigans at all times to cover their arms in order to “always maintain a formal and professional atmosphere.”
The new dress code was passed after a heated floor debate over the change, with Democratic lawmakers saying the new dress code is sexist and unfair.
Rep. Raychel Proudie argued against the dress code on the floor, saying that the matter was also a distraction from the real issues.
“There are some very serious things that are in this rule package that I think we should be debating, but instead we are fighting, again, for a woman’s right to choose something, and this time [it’s] how she covers herself,” Proudie said during Wednesday’s floor debate. “I spent $1,200 on a suit, and I can’t wear it in the People’s House because someone who doesn’t have the range tells me that’s inappropriate.”
The previous dress code for women in the Missouri House required them to wear “dresses or skirts or slacks worn with a blazer or sweater and appropriate dress shoes or boots.” Men are required to wear jackets, shirts, and ties.
The rule change was introduced by GOP Rep. Ann Kelly, who argued, “Men are required to wear a jacket, a shirt and a tie, correct? And if they walked in here without a tie, they would get gaveled down in a heartbeat. If they walked in without a jacket, they would get gaveled down in a heartbeat. So, we are so interested in being equal.”
The new bill originally required jackets or blazers for women, but was altered to include cardigans only after the floor debate.
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Civilization1 day ago
Tariffs and misunderstandings
-
Civilization4 days ago
NATO Is a Corpse – and Trump Might Be Its Undertaker
-
Civilization3 days ago
Populism, Political Violence, and the Collapse of Civil Discourse in America
-
Guest Columns4 days ago
Waste of the Day: Throwback Thursday: Paying Spanish-American War Tax a Century Later
-
Civilization4 days ago
Somebody Finally Got the Message About the Panama Canal
-
Executive2 days ago
Waste of the Day: The Entitlement Spending Doomsday Clock is Ticking
-
Executive4 days ago
Beware Progressive Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing
-
Executive3 days ago
Resetting the order