Big Pharma – germ warfare?

The night before last, Project Veritas released a sensational video from one of their many undercover operations. In it, a ranking executive of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals boasted that his company was running experiments to create mutant viral strains. The virus in question is, as should surprise no one, SARS-CoV-2. And the purpose? To develop these mutant strains, and immunizations against them, in parallel, to be ready to bring said preparations to market. If this allegation is correct, no one should think for one minute that Pfizer is the only company so acting. This means that the world’s drug companies, far from being the helpers of humankind they pretend to be, are willing to wage biological warfare on their own customers – for their pecuniary benefit, or for a worse motive.

The Project Veritas Pfizer video

Here is the Project Veritas video, available on Rumble. (YouTube has already removed it from their platform, citing their Vaccine Misinformation Policy.)

Herewith a partial transcript, which CNAV has taken from the Rumble page. Jordon Trishton Walker, M.D., serves as Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning at Pfizer Pharmaceuticals.

One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create – preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine – no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating … viruses.

Dr. Walker actually used a vulgar word, which we have chosen to replace with the ellipsis.

From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious – obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.

Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.

He admits – the virus didn’t come from the Wuhan wet market

You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s [baloney].

You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because …

Whereupon Dr. Walker invokes the Name of the Lord and Savior of humankind.

The cash cow

The Pfizer-BioNTech “vaccine” accounts for more than half the company’s revenues. That explains this part of the conversation:

Walker: Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist: Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker: Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist: What do you mean if it works?

Walker: Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist: Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker: Yeah, it’d be perfect.

The Big Pharma and government revolving door

Walker: [Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist: Wow.

Walker: In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs — eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.

…

Veritas Journalist: How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker: It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist: Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker: Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

That last segment illustrates something outsiders – and some medical students – have long suspected about the pharmaceutical industry. Recall the Pfizer Twitter File. It revealed a Pfizer board member, former head of the Food and Drug Administration, asking for direct censorship. Recall also the Big Pharma Twitter File, that revealed suppression of the movement toward an “open source” therapy development project.

But the problem is worse. This executive reveals that regulators commonly give Big Pharma free rein, because they will eventually seek employment in that industry.

Directed evolution – or gain of function?

The loquacious Dr. Walker made a distinction almost without a difference between gain-of-function research and what he called “directed evolution.” Directed evolution is another phrase for selective breeding – selecting for desired traits in multiple generations. Gain of function is the specific selection for a more transmissible, or more virulent, disease germ. (Hat tip: Alexander Grant, who wrote this article for Ty and Charlene Bollinger.)

Dr. Robert Malone, who heads The Unity Project, reacted in horror when Project Veritas interviewed him for their video. “This man has no moral compass whatsoever!” he said of Dr. Walker. But he said more:

Would it be feasible for Pfizer to circumvent international or national law? I think that is undeniable. [Walker] has clearly indicated that Pfizer believes that it has successfully captured the regulatory apparatus of the United States Government.

Remember: Pfizer captured the moderational apparatus of Twitter before Elon Musk bought it and fired all its top executive echelon.

Google steps in to help Big Pharma

The performance of the search engines is wildly inconsistent. The Brave search engine, at time of writing, produces a reasonable result. Google does not. According to Brian O’Shea, Google, Facebook, and LinkedIn have been frantically scrubbing all reference to Jordon Trishton Walker, M.D. Nevertheless enough records remain to state positively that he is whom Project Veritas say he is. (See also this article by Robert Turner, founding editor of Medika Life.) Twitter has not scrubbed anything, and Project Veritas has an account there:

Charlie Kirk interviewed James O’Keefe, head of Project Veritas:

Yesterday afternoon, Mr. O’Keefe, per his usual modus operandi, confronted Dr. Walker over what he had told his operative. Dr. Walker reacted on a level of physical violence.

Charlie Kirk also had his own tweet of the second video:

We now have a report from Human Events that The Daily Mail and Microsoft Network scrubbed their earlier stories about the interactions between Project Veritas and Dr. Walker.

Analysis

The various provenances, and the violent reaction by Dr. Walker to Mr. O’Keefe, clearly suggest that Project Veritas “nailed” Pfizer. But we cannot and should not assume that Pfizer is the only one. Though Pfizer alone arranged for censorship of a government agency head, all members of Big Pharma conspired to quash talk of “open-source” immunization development. Therefore, to assume that Pfizer alone engages in these practices would be dangerously facile. We must assume they are all guilty, or at least all at moral hazard.

Big Pharma has had a nasty reputation for systemic and institutionalized schadenfreude for decades. Indeed, advocates for socialism generally target them first. But they always accuse them of price gouging. Indeed, the “Heinz Dilemma” as Lawrence Kohlberg proposed it, has its basis in this price gouging reputation.

Until now no one has ever accused Big Pharma of biological warfare against the large patient population. This goes beyond any theory of moral development. This is the stuff of motion pictures in the horror, science-fiction, and political-thriller genres. Dr. Walker hinted at their motive: to tailor their immunizations to the new strains, thus making them more valuable. That, ladies and gentlemen, is racketeering.

Beyond that, Big Pharma has never supported sensible measures of dietary changes and supplementation. Happily, others have, and their recommendations are readily available. More broadly, this matter requires investigation at all levels, and that investigation should go beyond any consideration of viruses and immunizations alone.