Executive
Waste of the Day: Is NY Program Designed To Waste Money?
New York State insists that small towns and some counties share government services, like courts – and everything ends up costing more.
Topline: The State of New York has spent $40 million on its County-Wide Shared Service Initiative, which appears to exist for the explicit purpose of eliminating taxpayer savings.
New York tells towns to share services with other towns
Key facts: The program was established in 2017 to encourage small towns and villages to combine their local services and save money.
Two neighboring counties might merge their court systems, for example, or move their human resources departments into a shared office space and split the rent.
That’s when New York State steps in with “matching funds.” Localities send a report of how much money they saved, and the state sends them a cash reward.

Long Island’s Nassau County announced last month that its villages had saved $1.6 million by combining services. As a reward, the villages will receive $960,000 of taxpayer money from the state — erasing more than half of the savings.
In some instances, towns received matching funds that exceeded their reported savings. Onondaga County and the City of Syracuse announced they had saved $2.2 million by merging their Medicare plans in 2017. The state rewarded them with $5.7 million.
New York has awarded matching funds to over 100 applicants. There are 34 more awaiting potential funds.
But everything ends of costing more
One might argue that the program saves money in the long run. The matching funds are a one-time payment, while the local savings are permanent and can reduce property taxes.
However, it’s unclear why the matching funds are necessary at all. Tiny villages should not have separate local services in the first place. If the services can be combined, saving money should be its own incentive; no matching funds needed.
Search all federal, state and local government salaries and vendor spending with the AI search bot, Benjamin, at OpenTheBooks.com.
Summary: Paying local governments to spend less money is absurd both on paper and in practice.
The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com.
This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.
Jeremy Portnoy, former reporting intern at Open the Books, is now a full-fledged investigative journalist at that organization. With the death of founder Adam Andrzejewki, he has taken over the Waste of the Day column.
-
Education5 days agoWill Democrats Reject ‘Free Money’ for Schools?
-
Executive4 days agoThe Mother of the SAVE Act
-
Civilization4 days agoHow To Make Every Day Constitution Day
-
Executive4 days agoWaste of the Day: Planning A Canceled Project
-
Civilization4 days agoBurned on My 16th Birthday
-
Civilization3 days agoThe Politics of Religion
-
Executive3 days agoWhich Box Will You Check: Protect Your Financial Security, or Pay Higher Taxes and Costs?
-
Civilization2 days agoAmerica Must Be Able to Restore Its Space Power at War Speed

