Connect with us
The United States has taken steps to reshape the world, and those steps have borne fruit, isolating China and Russia.
Tom Friedman of The New York Times says he is torn between wanting the defeat of Iran but not wanting America or Israel strengthened.
A case study of the Gaza conflict, part of Harvard Business School's famous case-study course, shows inexcusable bias against Israel.
Operation Epic Fury had three prime ingredients for success: ability to attack first, no distractions, and a reliable ally.
A secular and democratic Iran would bring stability to the Middle East and change the geopolitical game with Europe, China and Russia.
Iran did pose an existential threat to America, as its own leaders loudly, and repeatedly, proclaimed before Trump went to war.
Joe Kent abruptly resigned and made several statements perhaps calculated to complicate Trump's relationships with his supporters.
Jew-haters have only envy – and ingratitude – left to them, to explain their continued unreasoning hate toward Jews.
Iran might well have no military of any consequence, but Washington risks losing the narrative even with the military gone.
Is America fully on board with bandwagoning with Israel? If so, what does that mean for the future of the Middle East?
