Executive
Vote for treason or freedom?
It has taken several months and a number of email dumps from Wikileaks to finally figure out what this presidential election is all about. There are only two ways to vote, for Donald Trump or for Hillary Clinton. But neither of those are what one would be voting for.
Vote for freedom or tyranny
A vote for Donald Trump is a vote to resist the massive corruption of government, and against globalism, against “global warming” or “climate change” theology. It is a vote against media collusion and interference in politics. A vote for Donald Trump is not for the person at all. That is why despite the media onslaught of negative stories about him as a person carries no weight with those who support him. Because they don’t support him at all, they support what he represents. This is a chance to hold Hillary Clinton responsible for her crimes and therefore all of the crooked politicians of 2012 who coerced votes out of their Republican base only to turn on them the next day.
Likewise, a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote for a transformed America, a quasi-police state where the government intervenes in business and forces some out of business while subsidizing other businesses that could not possibly sustain themselves without massive graft and media brainwashing. All of those businesses would be hostage to a criminal organization originating from the White House. It would be a vote to end forever the concept of individual rights. Hillary Clinton would do no less than continue the work of the Obama Administration to destroy individual rights and nearly half of the nation is in favor of just that. It would be a continued replacement of the voters who value the principles of the founding of this nation with those who have no like expectation. (Or the votes of the dead or the move-outs. — Ed.) It is a vote for the sudden disappearance of websites like this one.
War coming with Russia?
The outcome is bigger than that. The next president will likely be a true war-time president. As Vladimir Zhirinovsky claimed a vote for Hillary Clinton would be a vote for war. War with Russia may be inevitable and irrespective of the election as it seems likely that war will begin before the next president can take office. But, there is the question of who would be more likely to effectively fight that war. More than that, would our military leaders be willing to follow the orders of a criminal like Hillary Clinton running a crime organization out of Washington? Would they put their lives in jeopardy knowing the cold-blooded actions she demonstrated in Benghazi? Or, would they likely recognize that their lives meant nothing to the Commander in Chief?
Accountable leadership
So many things are now known about the media establishment and the collusion it shares with the Clinton campaign. More things are being found out every day as Wikileaks provides proof of the public perception. The people were right, there is a conspiracy to keep them uninformed and misinformed to protect Democrat politicians from facing scandals. It is clear now that there will never be a Democrat held accountable for their actions and therefore the only time Americans can expect to get anything other than abusive and criminal officeholders is if they elect a Republican.
This is where we get back to this truth. A vote for Donald Trump is nothing other than a vote for accountable leadership. A vote for Hillary Clinton is giving up on that ideal. A vote for Hillary Clinton is a choice to abolish the very principles of elected officials, because if their misdeeds can never be told and their abuses never aired, what have we? That we have so many in this nation willing to choose Hillary tells us all we need to know about the other side, that they have already given up, that they would rather have a totalitarian system. A vote for Hillary is, in effect an act of treason.
Editor’s note: As Project Veritas now shows, fraudulent votes have swayed elections in America for fifty years. To stop the Democratic Party from so swaying this election, CNAV recommends you wear red to the polling place, according to the plan Operation Red 2016. This will send a message to any election officer even thinking of tampering with vote totals: don’t.
-
Civilization4 days ago
China, Iran, and Russia – a hard look
-
Civilization3 days ago
Drill, Baby, Drill: A Pragmatic Approach to Energy Independence
-
Civilization3 days ago
Abortion is not a winning stance
-
Civilization1 day ago
The Trump Effect
-
Civilization3 days ago
Here’s Why Asian Americans Shifted Right
-
Executive2 days ago
Food Lobbyists Plot to Have It Their Way With RFK Jr.
-
Civilization4 days ago
Let Me Count the Ways
-
Civilization3 days ago
Who Can Save the Marine Corps?
Kathleen Sandifer liked this on Facebook.
Edward Krol liked this on Facebook.
Too much is at stake not to vote for Trump.
Jim Kinzer liked this on Facebook.
Jan Nyce liked this on Facebook.
Bennie Sue West liked this on Facebook.
Wanda Stewart liked this on Facebook.
Ron Chronicle liked this on Facebook.
Lynne Leary liked this on Facebook.
Joe Tellez liked this on Facebook.
Tony L Sundberg liked this on Facebook.
Catherine Mondy Boyce liked this on Facebook.
[…] Swirsky and Paul Eidelberg both cited Wikileaks in connection with the Hillary Clinton emails. A source at the now-defunct […]