Constitution
93% of Muslims in American Government Do Not and Will Not Express Support for the US Constitution! How Long Before the People Respond?
93% of Muslims won’t swear fealty to the Constitution. The reason: their foundational documents clash with the Constitution in several key particulars.
“It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” -Hassan Al-Banna
“The West is tremendously naive about the danger of these various Islamic organizations.” -Dr. Mamoun Fandy, Middle East expert on the network of organizations around the Muslim Brotherhood
Muslims do not want to assimilate, and they say they don’t.
Fifty years ago, I could have, and probably would have been called a conspiracy theorist for warning Americans of the coming judgments upon this country through the people that the Lord is using to do so (Deuteronomy 28:15-68). I’m talking about subversive Muslims that are not here to assimilate but to conquer, just ask them.
Today Muslims making their move in real time
Today, theory is far from this information laid before you because we see this all playing out before our eyes in real time. Theory no, conspiracy yes (Jeremiah 11:9).
JIHAD WATCH Reported that 93% of Muslim Public Officials Would Not Express Support for the Constitution They Swore to Uphold.
What follows between the lines are all direct quotes from this article, except for the headlines. I present it this way to account for quotes within quotes. – Ed.
Muslims numerous enough to choose speakers, senators, and governors?
It’s more than just about having three Muslims in Congress. I think symbolically it has great value. But I won’t rest until 2020 we have five more members of Congress. 2022 and 24, we have ten more Muslims in Congress. In 2030 we may have about 30, 35 Muslims in Congress. Then we’re talking about Madame Chair Rashida. We’re talking about Madame Chair Ilhan. Hell, we could be saying Speaker of the House Ilhan, Speaker of the House Rashida, Senator Rashida, Governor Ilhan, President Fatima, Vice President Aziza, Inshah’ Allah…
Each and every one of us has a directive to represent Islam, in all of our imperfections, but to represent Islam and let the world know that Muslims are here to stay, and Muslims are a part of America. And we will, we will have a Muslim caucus that is sizable, that is formidable, and that is there for you.
U.S. Congressman Andre Carson at the CAIR Community Congressional Reception, January 10, 2019
Requirement to take an oath to support the Constitution
People in public office at the local, state, and federal levels are required to take an oath of office that requires them to swear, or affirm, to support the U.S. Constitution. This is based on Article 6, Clause 3 of that Constitution (the “Oaths Clause”):
The Senators and Representatives[in Congress]before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…
As David Shestokas noted:
This constitutional requirement is binding upon every government official in the United States from state governors and judges to members of city councils, police officers, firefighters or board members of mosquito abatement districts and library boards.[1]
Muslims can’t swear because their foundational doctrines clash with the Constitution
The 2019 elections saw an increase in the number of Muslims re-elected and newly elected to public office across the United States, and as part of their oaths of office they each swear to support the U.S. Constitution. However, as I showed in my latest book Islamic Doctrine versus the U.S. Constitution: The Dilemma for Muslim Public Officials,[2] there are many core tenets of Islam that are in direct conflict with much of that Constitution.
In theory, however, one would think that after a Muslim public official had publicly taken an oath to support the U.S. Constitution, having to publicly choose between either following that Constitution or following Islamic Doctrine would be simple: a Muslim public official would abide by the oath of office and choose the Constitution.[3]
A test of fealty
So I decided to put that to the test. In Chapters 10 and 11 of my latest book I provided a number of questions that could be asked of a Muslim public official and that require that official to choose between the Constitution and Islamic Doctrine. I put four of those questions into an e-mail and individually sent that e-mail to eighty Muslim public officials across the United States.
We shall first look at the four questions I used and then examine the variety of responses I received. I then list the Muslim public officials, by State, who did not respond to what, considering their oath of office, should have been simple questions to answer. This is followed by my concluding remarks.
Article link here:
Look at how Muslims took over many countries in Europe
What is it that the American people do not understand when it comes to what is taking place here in the homeland? Look to Europe and you will soon understand.
What our forefathers and veterans have fought off concerning our sworn enemies (Say they), the American people are now accepting, and that to their own demise.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media
Bradlee Dean is an ordained Christian preacher, Radio show host for the #1 show on Genesis Communication Network from 2-3 p.m. central standard (The Sons of Liberty), a National Tea Party favorite. He also speaks on high school and college campuses nationwide. Bradlee is also an author, a husband to one, daddy to four boys. You have probably seen Bradlee through such outlets as The New York Times, Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, The Weekly Standard etc.
-
Clergy4 days ago
Faith alone will save the country
-
Civilization2 days ago
Elon Musk, Big Game RINO Hunter
-
Civilization5 days ago
Freewheeling Transparency: Trump Holds First Post-Election News Conference
-
Civilization5 days ago
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Will Rebuild Trust in Public Health
-
Civilization3 days ago
Legacy media don’t get it
-
Constitution19 hours ago
Biden as Feeble Joe – now they tell us
-
Executive2 days ago
Waste of the Day: Mismanagement Plagues $50 Billion Opioid Settlement
-
Civilization5 days ago
What About Consequences? Are Democrats Immune?
Where does the 93% figure come from? I am unable to find any citations concerning that assertion, on this page or any of the linked articles. Could someone please show me how this figure was deduced?
See the article from Judicial Watch. Follow that link.
The first thing people have to remember, or learn, is that Islam is NOT a religion. It is a theocracy that is dedicated to forcing people to worship the god Hubal. Islamic/Muslims have fealty to Islam and Islam alone. And Islam has been waging non-stop war for 1400 years ever since Mohammad’s lies about whom Hubal was was rejected by just about everyone.
The Arabic word “allah” is a contraction of the Arabic words “al”, which means “the”, and “ilah” which means “god”, which was used to reference Hubal. Hubal is associated with the moon and is chief god of a pantheon of around 360 gods and goddesses.