Connect with us

Entertainment Today

Blue Bloods Gone Oprah

Blue Bloods, a venerable New York-based crime drama, is going full Oprah now. Result: tanking ratings as disgusted viewers look elsewhere.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email



Blue Bloods features police cruisers like this one.

The TV shows I gravitate to with my husband Steve, a former athlete, include live baseball, basketball and football games. They also include historical documentaries, and both true crime shows and crime dramas. Among these title: Law & Order, Forensic Files, Chicago PD, and Blue Bloods. All are studies in the greatest mystery of all time, human behavior.

Introducing Blue Bloods

When Blue Bloods debuted in September 2010, we thought it was excellent, featuring in-depth and provocative episodes. And at last a show embodying the conservative values we embraced. We also noted a distinct lack of the three-legged stool on which Progressives base their so-called values. The legs are: moral relativism, political correctness, and multiculturalism.

The show is about the Reagan dynasty in NY City. The following characters appear every week with daunting challenges, moral dilemmas, high-action chases and arrests, and touching family dramas:

The cast of Blue Bloods – the Reagan family…

  • Frank Reagan (Tom Selleck), a widower and the New York Police Department (NYPD) Commissioner.
  • His father Henry Reagan (Len Cariou), also a widower and a former NYPD Commissioner.
  • Frank’s son Danny (Donnie Wahlberg), a tough, street-smart detective, and his partner Maria Baez (Marisa Ramirez). Danny was happily married to R.N. Linda (Amy Carlson) before her death. They were the parents of two sons played by real-life brothers Andrew and Tony Terraciano.
  • Frank’s daughter Erin (Bridget Moynihan), a letter-of-the-law Bureau Chief in the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and divorced mother of daughter Nicky (Sami Gayle). Erin works closely with Anthony Abetemarco (Steve Schirripa), a detective in the D.A.’s office.
  • Frank’s son Jamie (Will Estes), a Harvard Law School graduate who chose to become a street cop, made sergeant, and then married his NYPD partner—a beautiful blonde from a decidedly dysfunctional background—“Eddie” Janko (Vanessa Ray).

…and supporting associates

  • Frank’s Chief of Staff, Garrett Moore (Gragorh Jbara), who is also the NYPD Deputy Commissioner of Public Information.
  • I cannot omit the very gorgeous and fabulous actress Abigail Baker who plays Commissioner Reagan’s chief aide as Detective Abigail Hawk.

Suffusing the drama is the Commissioner’s late son Joe, an NYPD detective murdered by a corrupt gang of police officers. His memory continues to haunt the Reagan family.

Blue Bloods – the old format

Every week for the past many years, all these characters presented compelling and original drama. Typical episodes addressed such themes as the:

  • unreliability of eyewitnesses,
  • difficulty of identifying sociopaths,
  • nefarious inner workings of the New York mafia,
  • dangers of nepotism within the ranks,
  • reluctance of sexual assault victims to come forward,
  • complexity of solving murder cases,

on and on and on.

How to tell right from wrong

In every episode, it was clear that the protagonists—members of the NYPD from the top on down—knew the difference between right and wrong, good and bad, legal and illegal.

  • Right was the teenage kid from the projects who resisted following his thug friends into a life of crime. Wrong were the thugs who chose a life of crime, including robbery, rape and murder.
  • Good were the people who yearned for a safe neighborhood coming forward to identify the perps. Especially good were they who did so in spite of great risk to themselves and their families. Bad were the drug dealers and corrupt politicians who covered for the bad guys.
  • Legal were the follow-the-rules cops who crossed every “t” and dotted every “i.” Illegal were the on-the-take judges who ruled against them.

Riveting. Illuminating. Thought-provoking. Influential. Worthy of our time.

Blue Bloods followed the old values

Among the most refreshing qualities of the show was—not is—the great respect the children and grandchildren exhibited toward their father, the Commissioner, and their grandfather, the former Commissioner.

Every week, the show treated viewers to the Reagan clan gathering around a huge dining-room table for a sumptuous dinner. You saw platters of roast turkey and roast beef, mountains of salad and vegetables, and heaping portions of baked and mashed potatoes. One or another member of the family would say Grace before the meal. They thanked their Lord Jesus Christ for their bounty, performed the sign of the Cross, and in unison said Amen.

Even in disagreement, you always saw respect

While serious discussions and good-humored kidding took place around the table, philosophical disagreements also abounded. Yes, quizzical looks and raised eyebrows and even scowls appeared. But there was always a refreshing absence of the dismissive, rude, hostile and insulting behavior. To say nothing of the repulsively foul language we’ve become accustomed to in shows today. We hear that in shows ranging from newscasts to award shows to daytime talk shows to “Housewives” dramas. And you never saw any sign or sight of an iPhone!

Ratings don’t lie – and Blue Bloods is in the tank

According to Wikipedia, the pilot episode 10 years ago garnered 15,246 million viewers, and the ratings remained sky-high for about seven seasons. But from season eight on, the ratings began to plunge, with season nine seeing the lowest in the show’s history.

No mystery to me, as the Blue Bloods audience witnessed this once-terrific show go Oprah. It turned into both a social service and finger-wagging forum for setting Commissioner Frank Reagan and his unenlightened family straight. Not it would teach them the Progressive values that the leftist writers they hired wanted them to learn. In other words: how to be a moral relativist, a multiculturalist, a politically correct jerk.

Clueless writers doomed Blue Bloods

It is abundantly clear that the current writers had never watched the show. So they had no idea about the rock-ribbed simpatico dynamics of the Reagan family. Moreover they had contempt for the police, and had a deep loathing of the Christian religion and prayer. Even the mention of Jesus earned their disdain.

Disrespect in the family and in the ranks

Why else would they have the always respectful sons of Frank Reagan and their grandfather Henry speak to them with such antagonistic, disrespectful language? Why would they feature rookie and even senior policemen speak to the Commissioner in such brazenly inappropriate terms? And why would they completely eliminate the prayer before eating dinner and any reference to Jesus?

Why? I know nothing about corporate media or who calls the shots and ultimately determines content. But this is an all-important election year. And we already see the Murdoch boys pushing their properties—The Wall St. Journal and Fox News, among others—in a distinctly leftward direction. So it’s not a far stretch to theorize that anti-Trump CBS-TV is also pushing their popular shows along the same route.

Ed Asner and Tom Selleck? Seriously?

After all, why would they drag a veteran leftist, the seemingly dotty 90-year-old Ed Asner, out of his comfortable California home to star in a preposterous episode where the writers wasted our time watching Asner and his old friend Commissioner Reagan show off their knowledge of ancient movies?

Why? Clearly the writers want to make the Commissioner look like a regular guy. This will reduce his gravitas, and make him less important.

Why would they feature the toughest guy in town, Commissioner Reagan, visiting the new Mayor of NYC—who told him the City needed a tougher P.R. person than Reagan’s longtime Chief of Staff Garrett Moore—and then portray the Commissioner as an emotional, conflicted, hand-wringing wuss over a simple executive decision?

Why? Again, an attempt by the writers to make the Commissioner look incapable of taking charge and getting something done. This reminds you of Congressmen Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.).

The real goal: moral inversion

Of course, the goal of the real wusses writing this junk is to convince the viewing public that they’ve been wrong all along about Blue Bloods, that what we should really believe is that the police are the problem, prayer is the problem, Jesus is the problem, and we should vote for all the leftwing candidates who believe this tripe.

As for me and Steve, we’ve dropped this leftist travesty forever. So we are now enjoying both reruns and new episodes of the quite fabulous and compelling Chicago PD!


Joan Swirsky is a New York-based journalist and author. Her website is, and she can be reached at

About the image

“368214 -1 270714 CPS” by HHA124L is licensed under CC BY 2.0

Print Friendly, PDF & Email | Website | + posts

Joan Swirsky is a New York-based journalist and author. Her website is and she can be reached at

CATEGORY:Entertainment Today


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x