Judicial
Schiff says holding Bannon in criminal contempt ‘a way of getting people’s attention’
Rep Adam Schiff (D-CA) said that holding ex-Trump White House strategist Stephen Bannon in criminal contempt would get people’s attention and send a message.
On CNN Newsroom on Sunday, Schiff talked about the House committee investigating the January 6 insurrection. He said if Bannon is prosecuted, “other witnesses will see they will face real consequences, including jail time and potentially stiff fines” (MSN). Earlier this month, Bannon announced that he was not planning to comply with the subpoena issued to him by the House committee. His attorney, Robert Costello wrote, “We will comply with the direction of the courts.”
There were reports that former President Donald Trump had advised him and others not to comply. In response, Chair Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS) and Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-WY) wrote in a joint statement, “The Select Committee fully expects all of these witnesses to comply with our demands for both documents and deposition testimony […] we will swiftly consider advancing a criminal contempt of Congress referral. [The committee] will not be deterred by those who seek to obstruct our efforts.”
Congress is allowed to vote to refer noncompliant witnesses to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. This could lead to jail time, a fine, or both (The Hill). The Justice Department would then decide how aggressively they want to pursue the witness. Schiff said the committee would be writing the criminal contempt report on Tuesday night. After that, it would go to the entire House for a vote. If that passes, it will go to the Justice Department, where the consequences are “swifter” and “more serious”.
“Bannon is an important witness in his own right but it’s also important to send a message that the rule of law is back, and people are going to need to pay attention,” Schiff added. He went on to talk about how Bannon was one of Trump’s closest advisors prior to the capitol riot. “He was predicting that all hell was going to break loose on January 6th. So, he clearly has relevant information to share with the committee. And we’re going to make sure that he does.” Some of the committee members are talking about issuing Trump a subpoena, as well.
-
Executive2 days agoWaste of the Day: Can You Hear Me Now? No.
-
Civilization2 days agoTrump’s version of the Monroe Doctrine
-
Civilization3 days agoOne Fell Swoop: Lawsuit Eyes Death Blow to Racial Preferences
-
Civilization2 days agoTrump’s New Doctrine of Precision Deterrence
-
Civilization1 day agoThe Mission to Extradite Nicholas Maduro
-
Civilization1 day agoThe Snatch and Grab of Maduro Was Not ‘Illegal’
-
Executive4 days agoWaste of the Day: $1.6T in Wasteful Spending in Rand Paul’s “Festivus” Report
-
Guest Columns4 days agoAdvice to Democrats Regarding Maduro Arrest: Resist Reflexive Opposition
