Connect with us

Accountability

Army approves plans to lower physical fitness standards for women and older soldiers

Published

on

The Army has now approved plans to reduce physical fitness tests for women and older soldiers.

After a three year review, the Army has scrapped plans to use the same physical fitness test for all soldiers.

According to the Hill, the decision follows a RAND-led study that found that men were passing the newm more difficult Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) more easily than women and older soldiers. Women and older soldiers were found to be “failing at noticeably higher rates.”

The ACFT had been expanded in 2019 to six events from the original three. Those three included pushups, situps, and a run.

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth said in a statement, “This test is an essential part of maintaining the readiness of the Army as we transform into the ARmy of 2030. The revisions to the ACFT are based on data analysis, including an independent assessment required by Congress. We will continue to assess our implementation of the test to ensure it is fair and achieves our goal of strengthening the Army’s fitness culture.”

Advertisement

The six event ACFT included deadlifts, power throws, pushups, planks, run and sprint-drag-carry event, and a leg tuck. The leg tuck has since been removed. The Army believes these new changes will better reflect skills needed for combat and will reduce risk of injury.

From October 2020 to April 2021, around 44% of women failed the ACFT, while only 7% of men failed. The RAND study also determined that the ACFT did not accurately predict job performance. It was found to better assess physical fitness.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
+ posts

Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.

Advertisement
Click to comment
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Trending

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x