Accountability
Portland officials accused of misleading voters on charter ballot measure
Those who stand against ballot measure to radically reshape Portland’s form of government and election system have accused Portland city officials of misleading voters about the proposal.
Supporters of the ballot have said it’s a way to radically reimagine City Hall and is an important step addressing many of the crises Portland has faced in recent years while boosting diversity and civic engagement within the city government.
“Ultimately, we have a big opportunity at creating a participatory democracy and more accountable government,” said Anthony Castaneda, one of the co-chairs of the commission.
Members of the Partnership for Common Sense Government disagree with this stance and filed a complaint with the Portland city auditor and Oregon secretary of state this week on the grounds that the information published online by the city and mailed to thousands of residents was “thinly disguised advocacy in favor” of Measure 26-228.
“Portlanders have been clear they want accountability in politics,” group co-founder Vadim Mozyrsky said. “We have to ensure that voters have the needed and correct information in order to make an informed choice about the future of our democracy.”
Mozyrsky, who failed in a run for the Portland City Council in the May primary, served on the 20-person charter commission involved in putting together the measure. He was one of the three members who voted against it.
The complaint alleges city officials violated state law that prohibits public employees from showing either positive or negative bias towards a ballot while working on the taxpayer’s dime.
In a statement Wednesday, spokeswoman Sofía Álvarez-Castro said the city of Portland “is committed to providing only neutral and factual Information about [the] ballot measure.”
Alvarez-Castro said that the city-sponsored materials regarding the proposed charter changes were made in partnership with the Oregon Secretary of State’s Office and all are in compliance with Oregon state election law.
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
-
Civilization1 day agoTrump, China, and the Strategic Blind Spot in U.S. Policy
-
Civilization5 days agoIran’s Chemical and Biological Options in a U.S. Ground Invasion
-
Civilization4 days agoNATO and the Bar Fight: A Bar Tab Europe Expects America To Pay Forever
-
Civilization4 days agoThe Ideological Parallels Between ISIS and the IRGC
-
Civilization4 days agoNATO: No Action, Talk Only — The Alliance That Forgot How to Fight
-
Human Interest3 days agoHow ‘Giant’ Reopens the Question of Roald Dahl
-
Executive3 days agoFrozen Fuel: Alaska Eyes Another Epic Pipeline
-
Civilization2 days agoTrump Needs a Legal General, Not Just an Attorney General

