Ron Paul Russia Today flap
Does Russia Today back Ron Paul? Are they breaking US law? A long-time alternative-media organ charged just that yesterday.
What is Russia Today?
Russia Today is a multi-lingual TV network based in Russia. Persistent rumors—and that’s all they are, rumors—say that RT is a creature of Russian intelligence services. In other words, RT is a creature of the broken-up pieces of the old KGB. The most credible source for that is the Columbia Journalism Review. They say that RT is a creature of Vladimir Putin, the President of Russia. And Putin was a KGB apparatchik before the KGB spun off its Chief Directorates into separate agencies.
RT has many detractors. The Guardian (London) and Digital Journal both had unflattering articles about RT. The worst that anyone says is that RT promotes the values that Vladimir Putin wants to promote. But RT’s front page looks much like that of any other Internet news organ, and arguably is richer.
The show that everyone is now arguing about is Adam Kokesh’s Adam vs. The Man. Adam Kokesh does not promote left-wing propaganda. If he did, why does he attack Barack H. Obama’s bus tour?
In the last twenty-four hours, the argument turned ugly—because Adam Kokesh used a bad choice of phrase.
What did Adam Kokesh say about Ron Paul?
On his program that aired June 6, Adam Kokesh said this:
I’d like to end tonight on a note of some good news. We have some good news from the front lines of the Ron Paul “LOVEalution” with our money bomb on June 5. Yesterday we raised over $1 million for the Ron Paul campaign. And I’m starting to figure out what electable means, because electable or non-electable is really a code word for “if this person wins, I’m not gonna be able to get as much money from the government.”
(Note: “LOVEalution” is how to pronounce the word Revolution as it appears on Ron Paul campaign material, with the letters “e-v-o-l” highlighted and inverted to spell the word “L-O-V-E”.)
Who’s we? We could mean “friends of Ron Paul.” We could mean “Adam Kokesh and his staff.” Or, we could mean “the management of Russia Today.” Unlike American media, Russia Today does not “disclaim” its hosts’ comments. They do not say,
The views expressed by the host of this or any other program are his own and do not represent those of Russia Today.
Furthermore, no American network would allow any host to say we when talking about a political candidate he liked.
Perhaps journalistic standards in Russia are more lax. But so far, Adam Kokesh has said only that he, some friends of his, and maybe his employees, support Ron Paul. Kokesh did not say, “Russia Today” supports Ron Paul, or even “Vladimir Putin supports Ron Paul.”
The flap begins
But on Monday, August 15, the Free Republic site logged this post, suggesting that RT might have broken US law. It quoted an FEC pamphlet that says that foreign entities may not contribute to American political campaigns.
Then, late last night, WorldNetDaily published this article. It seems to quote the Free Republic post nearly verbatim, and without attribution. (Your editor found the Free Republic post while searching for footage proving that Adam Kokesh really said what WND accused him of saying.)
Ironically, the WND piece does quote Kokesh accurately as complaining that American news organs tend to ignore Ron Paul. Case in point: very few media organs even mentioned Ron Paul after the Ames straw poll, though he placed second by 152 votes out of 16,800 votes cast. (At least two other observers have complained about the same thing. Furthermore, the CommonSense2010 blog suggests that by any reasonable standard, Ron Paul should be the frontrunner for the Republican nomination.)
WND also went further than Free Republic did. They suggested that the government could prosecute Kokesh for giving “substantial assistance” to Ron Paul in his role as a Russia Today show host.
Friends of Ron Paul react
Friends and supporters of Ron Paul reacted swiftly. The site DailyPaul.com (not an official campaign site) accused WND of a “smear.”
They need a good lesson on how to do journalism.
Other supporters swamped the comment space of the WND piece. One commenter accused Texas Governor Rick Perry of accepting campaign contributions from China, and accused WND of using a double standard. He left no sources, and another commenter flatly accused him of lying. But most of the comments split about 3 to 2 in favor of Ron Paul. Supporters said that WND had not proved its case against Russia Today. The most cogent comment was this one, that the commenter addressed to the author of the article:
Your implication isn’t a concern. Kokesh has a show on RT and he supports Ron Paul. End of Story. In addition RT provides unbiased news topics regarding our nation and often discusses our founders intentions while Fox and CNN hardly ever reflect upon a news topic with the spirit of the founders intent. Kokesh, is on record to support peace and liberty. However, he doesn’t oppose civil disobedience as evident with his dance party [at the Jefferson Memorial]. Since Russia has moved towards free market principles and opposed many former regulations I would say Russia is moving in the right direction while our nation isn’t. Lastly, many Patriots and supporters of free market principles consider it more of an honor to be interviewed on RT vs. MSNBC or CNN. Lastly and on a very important note: RT was the only major news source to provide near equal coverage to 3rd party candidates such as Chuck Baldwin from the Constitution Party and Bob Barr from the Libertarian Party. Not even Fox news can boast of nearly equal coverage of 2008 presidential coverage. Perhaps you should have taken more time to consider the points above instead of negative implication[s].
Featured article: Representative Ron Paul (R-TX-14). Photo: US House of Representatives
Ron Paul target: guilt by association?
Terry A. Hurlbut has been a student of politics, philosophy, and science for more than 35 years. He is a graduate of Yale College and has served as a physician-level laboratory administrator in a 250-bed community hospital. He also is a serious student of the Bible, is conversant in its two primary original languages, and has followed the creation-science movement closely since 1993.
- Christianity Today
- Constitution 101
- Creation Corner
- Entertainment Today
- First Amendment
- Foundation of our Nation
- Guest Columns
- Human Interest
- Ignite the Pulpit
- Let's Talk
- Money matters
- Racial Issues
- Tea Party
- Trump elevator pitch
- World news
Executive4 days ago
Biden administration: just say anything!
Judicial5 days ago
Jack Daniels and VIP company go to Supreme Court over dog toy
News4 days ago
Macron criticized for removing expensive watch during pensions debate
Creation Corner4 days ago
Oumuamua – object of speculation
News4 days ago
China, US Navy spar over guided-missile destroyer in South China Sea
Executive3 days ago
Trump prosecution disappointment
Executive2 days ago
DeSantis losing key support
Executive4 days ago
Ron DeSantis’ donors and allies question if he’s ready for 2024
R.T. has to be operating by the good graces of the Kremlin. There is not much in Russia that is not under control of the Kremlin.
A Ron Paul presidency would be good news for Russia. Paul is an isolationist, therefore the Kremlin would be practically assured that the United States would not be any opposition, political or otherwise, to Russia’s designs of recouping the former Soviet Union’s sphere of influence, once again centered at the Kremlin.
How myopic of Russia to focus upon possible opposition from nations of the West (i.e. USA), when the Chinese dragon has its eye on the vast eastern Russian territory with its raw materials and mineral resources and a constantly diminishing population.
Calling Ron Paul an isolationist is a typical smear from the mainstream media and the power elite. What Ron Paul believes in is not isolationism but Let’s-mind-our-own-businessism. Let’s stop paying to defend countries like Germany and Japan who are wealthier than us and let’s stop trying to be the policeman of the world.