Connect with us

Guest Columns

Negotiating with Muslims

Published

on

A typical Muslim national flag: a crescent and star on a green field. Muslims use gradualism to extend this flag worldwide. Ironically, Islam also practices ioperational atheism with its absolute determinism.

Since Muslims regard “non-Muslims” as “pigs and “dogs,” and not as wolves, it is not enough for the disciples of Muhammad to kill non-Muslims. The proud warriors of Allah must also degrade infidels, especially Christians, Allah’s most numerous and most powerful opponents and competitors.

That’s what the Islamic war cry “Allahu Akbar” means: Allah is the greatest of the gods.

Muslims exploit Christian virtues as weaknesses

The Associated Press won't comment on the spectacle of a child training to kill. Muslims celebrate this kind of thing as an ideal in their rage against the rest of the world.

Muslims train their children this early to fight jihad: a flat-out, right-now, blood-and-flames war against all non-Muslims.

Overweening pride is the distinctive character trait of Muslims, in contrast to Christians, who exalt humility. Thus, for Muslims to degrade Christians only accentuates the lowliness in which Christians take pride!

To the extent that the Christian ethos influences the attitude of American diplomats and American foreign policy experts, these Americans are entrapped in an ironic and deleterious situation when dealing with Allah’s faithful. This is one, but not the only, reason why I oppose negotiations with Muslims.

In relating to the warriors of Allah, one should employ an uncompromising and coercive “either-or” approach.

Of course, such a modus operandi goes against the grain of liberals and democracies whose media are fond of Benjamin Netanyahu’s negotiating ideal of “reciprocity,” a concept utterly foreign to Islam.

Reciprocity is so foreign to Islam that its adoption by Muslims would be equivalent to a renunciation of their religion!

Yet this is precisely what is logically and politically entailed by the policy of “territory for peace” pursued by every Israeli prime minister from Yitzchak Rabin to Netanyahu, along with their countless experts in political science!☼

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
CATEGORY:Guest Columns
6 Comments
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ron Chronicle

Ron Chronicle liked this on Facebook.

Marian Huey Taylor

GRANT NO QUARTER TO THESE SAVAGES.

Chris Irish Kelly

wow,your extreme prejudice is getting worse.

Greg Saunders

Chris Irish Kelly I doubt that’s possible.

Chris Irish Kelly

LOL hey greg! you may be right!

[…] curse is indicative of folly and cowardice, or the inability to face the fact that Islamic leaders cannot engage in abiding compromise with the United States without violating their religion or Islamic […]

Trending

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x