Connect with us


Benghazi attack: what is Obama hiding?



Ambassador Stevens. Was he the pawn in the Benghazi attack, for something much bigger?

Late last evening, Fox News Channel broke the amazing story that proves, beyond doubt, that Obama and his administration knew immediately that the Benghazi attack on the US Consulate in Libya was being done by armed and organized terrorists.

The cable TV shows, thus far, are abuzz with this news. But they are asking the wrong questions. They speculate that the Obama administration fabricated and lied to obscure the erroneous declarations of Obama relating to Al Qaeda’s decimation and degradation. Ladies and gentlemen, not a chance.

Benghazi attack: what we now know

  1. Just two hours into the Benghazi attack Obama and the State Department knew it was under a military style assault.
  2. They had real time video taken by drones that overflew the Benghazi attack while it went down.
  3. Three brave American heroes fought off the overwhelmingly superior forces for almost 7 hours before the compound was breached.
  4. Obama never made a move to help them when jets could have been scrambled and been there in in time to possibly scare off the attackers with a strafing run.
  5. For five hours after the White House was informed, those men battled to hold the compound while Obama, reportedly went to bed.
  6. Earlier in that day, the Ambassador sent emails warning of the impending danger and the White House did nothing to bring assets in to help.


Ambassador Stevens. Was he the pawn in the Benghazi attack, for something much bigger?

Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. Photo: US Department of State.

So the question that needs to be asked is, why? Why would the President allow a 7 hour siege to take place without lifting a finger to help?

Is it possible Obama knew the Benghazi attack was going to take place and in fact was in cahoots with the fanatics? It appears now that the only security that was supposed to be there were local Libyans and the three American heroes were there just by chance.

So we are supposed to believe that Obama refused to send more security, refused to try to save the Ambassador, spent time creating a lie about some goofy video, all to cover up the fact that Al Qaeda is still a threat?

There has to be more to it than that. No one, not even Obama, would let 4 Americans be slaughtered and burned to death for something so trivial.

So what was it? Until the State Department comes clean, we are left with the only option and that is to speculate.

A set-up to release the Blind Sheikh?

[ezadsense midpost]

So speculate we will. Suppose Obama had made a deal with, oh let’s say a Muslim Brotherhood leader of a Middle East country to allow our Ambassador to be kidnapped and then traded for the Blind Sheikh? Obama could be seen as a hero for getting back the Ambassador and we would be told the Sheikh would be imprisoned in that country where he was transferred to.

A nice little boost in the polls just before the election.

Would that not explain why Obama did nothing for 7 hours? The hired Libyan guards were supposed to flee their post and let the Ambassador be taken?

But three American patriots were there and gave their lives in defense of their country.

Make no mistake. The above is just speculation. But until we get an answer from the White House that makes more sense than hiding the viability of Al Qaeda, this and other speculation will continue.

This may grow into the largest scandal ever perpetrated on the America people. Congress needs to bring every single administration official in to answer questions until we know why 4 Americans were left to die while the President went to bed.


October Surprise setup?

Reprinted from Tea Party Advocate Tracking Hub.

[ezadsense leadout]

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

#Benghazi attack: what is #Obama hiding? #teaparty #sgp #tcot

Deborah Pond

Deborah Pond liked this on Facebook.

Theresa Brooks

Theresa Brooks liked this on Facebook.


Benghazi attack: what is …


Benghazi attack: what is …

Nathan Bickel

Dwight –

Nice commentary and plausible speculation. I have no doubt that this is a likely scenario. It is common knowledge of Obama’s Muslim bent. Else why would there be so many Muslim visitors to the White House who sympathize with the Muslim / Islamic (terrorist) world view?

Just today Defense Sec. Panetta, is supplying smoke screen cover for the Obama administration, basically claiming in lame brain fashion that there was no time to act and that he didn’t want to commit a strike force when they were unsure of enemy ground conditions. That is no viable excuse, especially given the request by Ambassador Stevens earlier on in the day and the previous violence against the consulate compound. What we have is a huge scandal and the Obama administration is deep in lies, as evidenced by blaming the attack on a video. Here, following are some of my thoughts and helpful informational links:

The latest Obama scandal lies and sixty five other lies

Nathan M. Bickel



[…] contributor Dwight Kehoe suggested that Obama set up a kidnap, all right. Only Obama planned to swap Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, “The […]

[…] contributor Dwight Kehoe suggested that Obama set up a kidnap, all right. Only Obama planned to swap Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, […]

[…] Obama running guns into Syria? Or if not, what else was he hiding? (The beaten Al Qaeda narrative can’t be […]


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x