The rule of law is a basic principle of Torah Judaism and of classical democracy. The rule of law affirms that those who make the laws are obliged to obey the laws. Accordingly, Jewish law enables private citizens to bring public officials, including a King or a Prime Minister, to the bar of justice.
Breaches of rule of law
The rule of law as just defined does not exist in Israel. Abbie Nathan and Shimon Peres made contact with Yasser Arafat in violation of the 1986 Prevention of Terrorism Act. Mr. Nathan, a private citizen, was incarcerated for six months for that felony. Shimon Peres was never indicted. Instead, the Knesset elected him President of the State of Israel!
Moshe Feiglin was convicted of sedition for having organized a demonstration that caused a major disruption of traffic in Israel. Contrast former Arab MK Hashim Mahameed. In 1991, Mahameed urged Arabs in Gaza to “fight the conquerors [i.e. Israel] with all the means they [these Arabs] have.” Nevertheless, he was not indicted for sedition (nor for violating the Prevention of Terrorism Act). In fact, the Knesset did nothing more than suspend for three months his parliamentary privilege of unrestricted access to all areas of the country! What a travesty of justice and the rule of law.
The alternative to the rule of law is the rule of men. The rule of men results in arbitrary government and, inevitably, officially sanctioned violence against citizens who protest Government policies. It is in this light that we are to understand why Israeli police often employ undue force and even brutality against citizens engaged in peaceful demonstrations. Backed by the Government, hence by its Ministry of Justice, the police can resort to such violence without being liable to compensatory and punitive damages.
Countless violations of the law or of administrative procedures by elected and appointed officials are annually reported by Israel’s State comptroller, yet virtually nothing is done to bring the culprits to justice. The citizen (as well as the State Comptroller) is powerless to correct these abuses. And so, not only is justice intermittent in Israel, but the deliberate sense of the public is ignored between elections in that occasional democracy.
How to restore the rule of law
Since democratic elections in Israel are not sufficient to make the Government accountable to the people, Israel requires a new system of justice. No political party in Israel has the wit and the courage to initiate such an undertaking. To illustrate what I have in mind, contemplate a Committee of Justice whose purpose is to overhaul Israel’s legal system and make it more consonant with Jewish law and democracy.
Obviously the chairman of this committee should be conversant in Jewish as well as in secular law. Consistent with the Foundations of Law Act of 1980, and as once stated by Professor Menachem Elon, a former Deputy President of the Supreme Court, Jewish Law should be “primus inter pares” (first among equals) vis-à-vis English and American law in Israeli jurisprudence. Jewish law should also be used to make public officials accountable to the people. The following principles should apply.
- A private citizen who suffers injury (as defined by law) from the act of any public official may sue the official for compensatory and punitive damages. The implementation of such a law would dramatically reduce not only police brutality, but the tens of thousands of false arrests that occur each year in Israel.
- Any suit involving a public official will be tried by a jury composed of qualified private citizens, namely college or Jewish academy graduates. Such a law would greatly diminish the number of “cover-ups” that enable public officials to violate the law with impunity.
- No person convicted of a felony will be released from jail prior to the termination of his sentence without the approval of a parole board consisting of qualified private citizens. This will preclude the unconscionable release of Arab terrorists.
- Plea bargaining will be prohibited. This piece of legal chicanery not only undermines respect for law but enables criminals to avoid justice.
- Any legislator that votes for a bill or treaty that contradicts his campaign pledges will be subject to recall, i.e., removal from office. (This will necessitate making MKs accountable to the voters in constituency elections).
The above provisions are but a sample of what is required to make Israel an authentic Jewish democracy, where the rule of law and justice prevail. In fact, it was precisely the absence of authentic democracy and the rule of law that led to the Israel-PLO Agreements, as well as to the utter violation of justice perpetrated by Israeli governments that unlawfully released Arab terrorists and even surrendered Jewish land to these murderers!
Unfortunately, many Jewish organizations, preoccupied with the deadly consequences of those agreements, have ignored their basic cause, namely, the abysmal fact that Members of the Knesset are not individually accountable to the voters in constituency elections.
- Christianity Today
- Constitution 101
- Creation Corner
- Entertainment Today
- First Amendment
- Foundation of our Nation
- Guest Columns
- Human Interest
- Ignite the Pulpit
- Let's Talk
- Money matters
- Racial Issues
- Tea Party
- Trump elevator pitch
- World news
Constitution1 day ago
Declaration of Independence – what it means
Accountability2 days ago
R. Kelly sues prison for placing him on suicide watch following conviction
Legislative3 days ago
Rep. Lauren Boebert in worship service speech: ‘Church is supposed to direct government’
Accountability4 days ago
Supreme Court rules President Biden can end Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy
Guest Columns2 days ago
We must get Trump
Constitution2 days ago
Lauren Boebert denounces faith-state separation
Constitution3 days ago
Election law leads SCOTUS 2022 term
Accountability2 days ago
Uvalde police chief Pete Arredondo announces his resignation