Connect with us

World news

Islam and Israel: no peace

Published

on

Seal of the Islamic State, the face of Islam today. Islam is not religion but politics pretending to be religion. This is the secret of Islamic imperialism. Is Obama their secret ally, fostering Muslim sedition? This is why we need security. And mere word-mongers and pussy cats cannot fight this effectively.

A candid review of Islam and democracy reveals basic and insurmountable contradictions between Israel and any Islamic regime:

Islam v. democracy: freedom and equality

Freedom, including freedom of speech, forms one of the two cardinal principles of democracy. But Islam is strictly authoritarian. So Islamic media always work under state control.

Equality forms the other cardinal principle of democracy. Islam features a strict hierarchy. It has top-down leadership as a fundamental principle of its theology. Authority runs down from Allah to Muhammad and from Muhammad to the imam, the ruler of the regime.

Consent v. coercion

Map of Islam showing Israel by comparison. Jihad is the means of extending that map to cover the world.

Islam has far more space on the map than has tiny Israel.

Democracy depends on the primacy of consent or persuasion. This adorns democratic societies with a certain easy-going-ness and civility. Not only do people readily sweep aside past grievances, but also political opponents can have friendships despite their differences. They resolve differences by mutual concessions, and agreements usually last.

In contrast, Islamic culture depends on the primacy of coercion. Agreements between rival factions do not really terminate animosities. Therefore such agreements do not last.

Democratic regimes, depending as they do on the primacy of consent, normally pursue peace. In contrast, because Islamic culture bases itself on the primacy of coercion, Islamic regimes normally pursue intimidation and conquest. Muslims hold jihad (holy war) as a basic principle. So we find Muslim violence throughout the world.

The individual and the group

Democracy also emphasizes the primacy of the individual. Islamic culture emphasizes the primacy of the group—either the village, or the extended family. The individual Muslim has no identity outside the group, and he owes the group all his loyalty. For this among other reasons, internecine conflict has been endemic among Muslims throughout history.

In contemporary democracy, individuals pursue their private interests and have diverse values or “lifestyles.” We don’t see that in Islam. Islam binds everyone to the set of substantive values in the Quran and in Islamic law (the shariah).

Living in present or past

Contemporary democracy inclines toward moral relativism. But Islam relies on absolutism. When moral relativism does not degenerate into moral reversal, contemporary democracy conduces to tolerance. Islam conduces to intolerance. Admittedly, Islamic regimes tolerate non-Islamic minorities, but only as dhimmis—virtual pariahs.

Democratic societies work and think in the present (the Now). Conversely, Islamic culture exists under the aspect of eternity. The past dominates Islamic mentality. So revenge for past injuries pervades the Islamic world as the dominant motif. With their group loyalty, Muslims bind themselves religiously to wreak vengeance against those who have slighted the honor of any Muslim.

The openness or publicity found in democracy stands in striking contrast to the hiddenness, secrecy, and dissimulation (taqiyya) characteristic of Islam. As one intellectually liberated Muslim sociologist writes about Arabs:

Lying is a widespread habit among the Arabs, and they have a low idea of truth.

Religious imperative

Contemporary democracy has a mild secularism at its root. Islamic culture has a different root: a harsh religion. Even Arab leaders who do not practice Islam devoutly, identify with the basic goals of Islam. The radical separation of religion and politics found in democracy does not happen in Islam.

Democracy—before its corruption by skepticism—respects the Judeo-Christian concept of man’s creation in the image of God (Genesis 1:26). Islamic theology rejects that concept as blasphemous.

Democracy, consistent with Genesis 1:26, affirms the moral unity of mankind. But Islam reduces non-Muslims to apes and dogs.

Democracy—before its corruption by moral relativism—extols the primacy of reason. Islamic theology exalts the primacy of will. Hence the Taliban proclaims: “Throw reason to the dogs—it stinks of corruption.” The unqualified or absolute omnipotence which Islam attributes to Allah, drove that statement.

Summing up

The preceding facts show that Islam and democracy are absolutely incompatible. So genuine peace between the “Palestinians” (i.e.) Muslims in the misnamed West Bank (i.e., Judea and Samaria) cannot happen. This reduces PM Netanyahu’s “two state solution” to mere rhetoric or intellectual dishonesty.☼

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
CATEGORY:World news
17 Comments
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert Houlst

Robert Houlst liked this on Facebook.

Gloria Shank Yazdani

Gloria Shank Yazdani liked this on Facebook.

Alexander Borsuk

This is a most idiotic statement . Israel has a few million citizens , Islam is perhaps the major Religion in this world , 1.5 billion people! I predict coexistence…

Melissa M Leibold

I also believe a two state solution is impossible. They cannot coexist when the main goal of one state is to wipe the other off the map.

Melissa M Leibold

Melissa M Leibold liked this on Facebook.

Bennie Sue West

I can’t see the radical Islamist EVER accepting the Jewish people. It appears to be demonic. To do the unthinkable things they have done to innocent people. That have shed innocent blood. And we know what the Bible says about that.

Alexander Borsuk

Radical Islamist is a political term for terrorist in the US . There is a difference between Islam vs Israel , and discussions about radical Islamists and Israel . Either Hurlbut is deliberately confusing Islam versus “radical Islamist” , or He’s misinformed ….

Kirt Adams

Read the Quran before you criticize. Read the WHOLE Quran. Their whole ideology is hate and violence based.

Terry Hurlbut

I don’t have the confusion, Alexander Borsuk. You do. The Koran commands its readers to fight. Radical Islam is the true Islam. The rest is only cafeteria Islam.

Alexander Borsuk

Terry Hurlbut , Before quoting the Quran for inspiration , and advising others to war , why not spend some time reading the Bible , Christian and Jewish , see what it advocates for you non military types . If 1.5 Billion Muslims believed in war , your ass wouldn’t be here .

Terry Hurlbut

Enough Muslims believe in war to make it inevitable.

Alexander Borsuk

Terry , like many of us You know little or nothing of Muslims , what they believe or want . In viewing your CV , military service is not listed , nor is foreign employment . I know too many “warriors” that never fought for their Country , killed another soldier , as they tried to kill you , heard the mortar or grenade explode , fixed bayonets . Walk through a VA Hospital sometime Terry , than tell us what you saw , and why you’re ready for war ……..

Ted Foster

Ted Foster liked this on Facebook.

Kirt Adams

Kirt Adams liked this on Facebook.

Bennie Sue West

Bennie Sue West liked this on Facebook.

Nick Raygun

I don’t believe muslems can coexist with any modern society.

Alexander’s Kool-aid mustache can be seen from space. People like that will deny the facts until Achmed comes up behind them and slits their throats. Natural selection at work, I suppose.

Nick Raygun

Nick Raygun liked this on Facebook.

Trending

17
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x